Skip to content

BREAKING: X CEO Linda Yaccarino Steps Down One Day After Elon Musk’s Grok AI Bot Went Full Hitler

Technology
188 138 0
  • I build a YouTube to Transcript online tool

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    4 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • FairPhone AMA

    Technology technology
    5
    14 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    37 Aufrufe
    alcan@lemmy.worldA
    Ask Me Anything
  • Firefox 140 Brings Tab Unload, Custom Search & New ESR

    Technology technology
    41
    1
    234 Stimmen
    41 Beiträge
    168 Aufrufe
    S
    Read again. I quoted something along the lines of "just as much a development decision as a marketing one" and I said, it wasn't a development decision, so what's left? Firefox released just as frequently before, just that they didn’t increase the major version that often. This does not appear to be true. Why don't you take a look at the version history instead of some marketing blog post? https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/releases/ Version 2 had 20 releases within 730 days, averaging one release every 36.5 days. Version 3 had 19 releases within 622 days, averaging 32.7 days per release. But these releases were unscheduled, so they were released when they were done. Now they are on a fixed 90-day schedule, no matter if anything worthwhile was complete or not, plus hotfix releases whenever they are necessary. That's not faster, but instead scheduled, and also they are incrementing the major version even if no major change was included. That's what the blog post was alluding to. In the before times, a major version number increase indicated major changes. Now it doesn't anymore, which means sysadmins still need to consider each release a major release, even if it doesn't contain major changes because it might contain them and the version name doesn't say anything about whether it does or not. It's nothing but a marketing change, moving from "version numbering means something" to "big number go up".
  • Here's your first look at the rebooted Digg | TechCrunch

    Technology technology
    59
    1
    111 Stimmen
    59 Beiträge
    234 Aufrufe
    M
    Digg has been basically dead for 15 years.
  • 275 Stimmen
    68 Beiträge
    241 Aufrufe
    A
    intellectual property is grotesque. under no circumstances a creator should be barred from his creation. if shit like that happens I'd rather there not be any intellectual property at all
  • 99 Stimmen
    47 Beiträge
    173 Aufrufe
    P
    One of the greatest videos ever.
  • Sunsetting the Ghostery Private Browser

    Technology technology
    8
    1
    33 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    38 Aufrufe
    P
    Sunsetting Dawn? Of course
  • Building a personal archive of the web, the slow way

    Technology technology
    2
    1
    24 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    16 Aufrufe
    K
    Or just use Linkwarden or Karakeep (previously Hoarder)