Skip to content

Musk's AI firm deletes posts after chatbot praises Adolf Hitler

Technology
31 28 0
  • Windows 11 finally overtakes Windows 10 [in marketshare]

    Technology technology
    32
    1
    63 Stimmen
    32 Beiträge
    79 Aufrufe
    H
    Yeah, and its most likely only due to them killing Windows 10 in the fall, which means a lot of companies have been working hard this year to replace a ton of computers before October. Anyone who has been down this road with 7 to 10 knows it will just cost more money if you need to continue support after that. They sell you a new license thats good for a year that will allow updates to continue. It doubles in cost every year after.
  • Trump says US will start talks with China on TikTok deal this week

    Technology technology
    7
    56 Stimmen
    7 Beiträge
    37 Aufrufe
    L
    Walk me thru how the tariffs will work on that, will ya taco boy?
  • 0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    9 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 139 Stimmen
    28 Beiträge
    137 Aufrufe
    D
    Lmao it hasn't even been a year under Trump. Calm your titties
  • 39 Stimmen
    15 Beiträge
    28 Aufrufe
    C
    I believed they were doing such things against budding competitors long before the LLM era. My test is simple. Replace it with China. Would the replies be the opposite of what you've recieved so far? The answer is yes. Absolutely people would be frothing at the mouth about China being bad actors. Western tech bros are just as paranoid, they copy off others, they steal ideas. When we do it it's called "innovation".
  • Meta is now a defense contractor

    Technology technology
    54
    1
    361 Stimmen
    54 Beiträge
    188 Aufrufe
    B
    Best decision ever for a company. The US gov pisses away billions of their taxpayers money and buys all the low quality crap from the MIL without questions.
  • 462 Stimmen
    94 Beiträge
    279 Aufrufe
    L
    Make them publishers or whatever is required to have it be a legal requirement, have them ban people who share false information. The law doesn't magically make open discussions not open. By design, social media is open. If discussion from the public is closed, then it's no longer social media. ban people who share false information Banning people doesn't stop falsehoods. It's a broken solution promoting a false assurance. Authorities are still fallible & risk banning over unpopular/debatable expressions that may turn out true. There was unpopular dissent over covid lockdown policies in the US despite some dramatic differences with EU policies. Pro-palestinian protests get cracked down. Authorities are vulnerable to biases & swayed. Moreover, when people can just share their falsehoods offline, attempting to ban them online is hard to justify. If print media, through its decline, is being held legally responsible Print media is a controlled medium that controls it writers & approves everything before printing. It has a prepared, coordinated message. They can & do print books full of falsehoods if they want. Social media is open communication where anyone in the entire public can freely post anything before it is revoked. They aren't claiming to spread the truth, merely to enable communication.
  • The mystery of $MELANIA

    Technology technology
    13
    1
    25 Stimmen
    13 Beiträge
    54 Aufrufe
    geekwithsoul@lemm.eeG
    Archive