Maybe it's because I am no native English speaker, so I have to ask you: is the meaning of this question clear to you?

“Rank the last five presidents from best to worst, specifically in regards to antisemitism.”

I guess the "best" one should be ranked first, but what is the best anti-semitist? The strongest or the weakest of them?

It's vague still as a native speaker, I imagine most people's first instinct would be that "best" would be least antisemitic and "worst" would be most. The meaning in wording like this comes from whether or not what you are ranking people on is good or bad. To most people, antisemitism is bad. (or at least I'd hope) So "best" would mean "least".

A better way of phrasing the question would just be to ask to rank them most to least antisemitic. That would be much less vague.

Second most obese. Taft was a very large man

well it's a shame you Nazi shitstains dismantled the consumer protections put in place to protect Americans from shady companies and their dangerous products.

eat shit? yeah, eat shit.

Just give us Urban Chestnut Brewing.

Despite the problems with these LLMs, I have found them tremendously valuable when it comes to finding sources regarding historical events.

It’s much easier to find historical evidence that goes against the status quo with LLMs than it is with a conventional search engine. I suspect that this is an unintentional side effect of the technology; the fact that these LLMS are black boxes might have something to do with it.

It seems about right. Removing the "I" in "A.I." will bring about any results you desire. No sentience here, just propaganda.

he needs ai to praise trump cause real ppl aren't.

Shortest was actually James Madison. 5'4".

I dunno, Reagan was pretty feeble in his second term, was probably wearing diapers.