Skip to content

Chrome VPN Extension With 100k Installs Screenshots All Sites Users Visit

Technology
90 54 0
  • 334 Stimmen
    122 Beiträge
    2 Aufrufe
    S
    You would have better luck with a dating sim then AI as emotional support. Might inspire you to make a real friend.
  • Considering the current trent I believe this is relevant

    Technology technology
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    13 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 103 Stimmen
    9 Beiträge
    129 Aufrufe
    B
    Dude, what is this book. Who writes like this? I fucking adore it
  • 47 Stimmen
    13 Beiträge
    162 Aufrufe
    N
    They don't treat their people like shit, they treat them like slaves. In countries outside China at that. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c3v5n7w55kpo
  • 310 Stimmen
    37 Beiträge
    389 Aufrufe
    S
    Same, especially when searching technical or niche topics. Since there aren't a ton of results specific to the topic, mostly semi-related results will appear in the first page or two of a regular (non-Gemini) Google search, just due to the higher popularity of those webpages compared to the relevant webpages. Even the relevant webpages will have lots of non-relevant or semi-relevant information surrounding the answer I'm looking for. I don't know enough about it to be sure, but Gemini is probably just scraping a handful of websites on the first page, and since most of those are only semi-related, the resulting summary is a classic example of garbage in, garbage out. I also think there's probably something in the code that looks for information that is shared across multiple sources and prioritizing that over something that's only on one particular page (possibly the sole result with the information you need). Then, it phrases the summary as a direct answer to your query, misrepresenting the actual information on the pages they scraped. At least Gemini gives sources, I guess. The thing that gets on my nerves the most is how often I see people quote the summary as proof of something without checking the sources. It was bad before the rollout of Gemini, but at least back then Google was mostly scraping text and presenting it with little modification, along with a direct link to the webpage. Now, it's an LLM generating text phrased as a direct answer to a question (that was also AI-generated from your search query) using AI-summarized data points scraped from multiple webpages. It's obfuscating the source material further, but I also can't help but feel like it exposes a little of the behind-the-scenes fuckery Google has been doing for years before Gemini. How it bastardizes your query by interpreting it into a question, and then prioritizes homogeneous results that agree on the "answer" to your "question". For years they've been doing this to a certain extent, they just didn't share how they interpreted your query.
  • The British jet engine that failed in the 'Valley of Death'

    Technology technology
    16
    1
    40 Stimmen
    16 Beiträge
    153 Aufrufe
    R
    Giving up advancements in science and technology is stagnation. That's not what I'm suggesting. I'm suggesting giving up some particular, potential advancements in science and tecnology, which is a whole different kettle of fish and does not imply stagnation. Thinking it’s a good idea to not do anything until people are fed and housed is stagnation. Why do you think that?
  • Elon Musk’s Neuralink raises fresh cash at $9B valuation

    Technology technology
    15
    1
    12 Stimmen
    15 Beiträge
    168 Aufrufe
    bizzle@lemmy.worldB
    I'd rather die than let Elon Musk put shit in my brain.
  • Dear Brother Printers: Eat a [Sponsor friendly words here]

    Technology technology
    2
    1 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    32 Aufrufe
    A
    Why doesn't Amazon just sell a generic printer that works with generic toner or pigment or ink. I would buy.