Australian anti-porn group claims responsibility for Steam's new censorship rules in victory against 'porn sick brain rotted pedo gamer fetishists', and things only get weirder from there
-
Supposedly there was a ruling in California that made them responsible.
Do you have any info or links about that?
-
"Pro life feminist"
A christian conservative group in drag,nothing to see here.
Yep. They drive all the decent people out of anti porn feminist spaces, like the porn is misogyny subreddit. They need to be stopped.
-
It's pretty easy to switch between cryptocurrencies, so they can surely find an exchange that is friendly to their business. That's way better than the credit card situation where there are only four major processors--Visa, Mastercard, Discover, and American Express--and only two of those actually matter.
None of what you said addresses the problem I mentioned.
-
TERFs are as feminist as Nazis are socialist and North Korea is democratic. It's in the acronym; that's it.
Sadly from my experiences with feminist groups, TERFs have historically been the norm not the exception.
You should really look into what the Daughters of Bilitis were up to, and books like the The Transsexual Empire. A book I cannot say the full name of for it contains a slur.
Historically feminist groups have attacked transgender women and gay men for "Infringing upon what it means to be a woman."
-
It's not about porn games. It's about allowing third-party private interests to engage in censorship.
If Valve were to ban porn games from being sold on Steam because they find them distasteful, I wouldn't have a problem with this. But it wasn't Valve's decision. It was the payment processors who did it on behalf of interests that are apparently allowed to determine what is permissible on other people's platforms.
That's not okay.
So this is basically the same as the argument that drugs shouldnt be illegal? Is this just purely based on freedom?
-
I would say they aren't as bad as alcohol and gambling, which are pervasive...some of them are just...art...some aren't
I could ask you the same about lots of other things, from music to literature. I just don't like book burning. If someone put their effort into creating something that they thought was worth creating, why is it up to anyone to ban it for any adult that wants to see it?
If someone wants it then they should be allowed it right? Great moral system you have there. Call it the "why not?" gospel.
-
If someone wants it then they should be allowed it right? Great moral system you have there. Call it the "why not?" gospel.
Nice strawman.
-
The majority of the secular world are atheists. Don't pretend like it is some small subsection just because you live in a bubble of whatever religion you were born into.
Bro I don't believe in God either. To be honest sometimes I wish I did.
Regardles my problem isn't with atheism but with specifcally Reddit Atheism
-
None of what you said addresses the problem I mentioned.
Then I guess I don't understand your problem.
Payment processors like Visa and Mastercard control a huge chunk of the market, which gives them a lot of say in what transactions are allowed. Even if you avoid credit, most debit cards go through those two companies, so they can restrict what transactions you can make.
With cryptocurrencies, there's no restriction at the point of sale. Your problem seems to be that converting crypto to fiat could be problematic, and they'd potentially be stuck with "useless" currency. My point is that's a much easier problem to solve:
- if their exchange stops converting a given currency, they can convert to one they do accept
- if their exchange bans their account (e.g. due to the nature of their business), they can switch exchanges
- there are ATMs that dispense cash for crypto
- if no exchange will work with them, they can make direct exchanges with regular people (i.e. "launder" the money)
- they can also spend the currency directly
There are a ton of options to convert crypto to fiat, there are far fewer to select a different fiat payment processor.
-
Do you have any info or links about that?
Unfortunately not. It was mentioned in a lemmy comment.
-
Nice strawman.
Should be easy to refute then but somehow you forgot to do that.
-
That sounds like the whatever version of engrish and I love it
It's meant to be read like a boris skit, than it works flawlessly.
-
The majority of the secular world are atheists. Don't pretend like it is some small subsection just because you live in a bubble of whatever religion you were born into.
Agnostics. Not necessarily atheists. And they sure as hell aren't sam harris type dickheads about it like this lemmy thread has.
-
Its more perverted to want to control what other people are jacking to than it is to jack it to porn games. Keep your perversions to yourselves weirdos.
This is the exact thing I've always thought about homophobes. It's pretty gay to get obsessed about what other men do with their dicks.
-
Agnostics. Not necessarily atheists. And they sure as hell aren't sam harris type dickheads about it like this lemmy thread has.
Agnostic sounds like a sub-category of atheism like it is with different beliefs under theism. Ie. It's Theism vs Atheism, and then everything below the two. If you don't believe or don't know if you should believe, then you're not really a theist, making it atheist.