Skip to content

“You can't be expected to have a successful AI program when every article, book or anything else that you've read or studied, you're supposed to pay for”, President Trump says

Technology
193 143 40
  • Broadcom Eyes $2 Trillion Club as AI Chip Demand Explodes

    Technology technology
    2
    1
    39 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    26 Aufrufe
    I
    Selling shovels in a gold rush, can't say I blame them.
  • 114 Stimmen
    10 Beiträge
    45 Aufrufe
    S
    I admire your positivity. I do not share it though, because from what I have seen, because even if there are open weights, the one with the biggest datacenter will in the future hold the most intelligent and performance model. Very similar to how even if storage space is very cheap today, large companies are holding all the data anyway. AI will go the same way, and thus the megacorps will and in some extent already are owning not only our data, but our thoughts and the ability to modify them. I mean, sponsored prompt injection is just the first thought modifying thing, imagine Google search sponsored hits, but instead it's a hyperconvincing AI response that subtly nudges you to a certain brand or way of thinking. Absolutely terrifies me, especially with all the research Meta has done on how to manipulate people's mood and behaviour through which social media posts they are presented with
  • Canada Drops Digital Tax That Infuriated Trump to Restart Trade Talks

    Technology technology
    17
    80 Stimmen
    17 Beiträge
    91 Aufrufe
    R
    Jesus fuck that’s a lot of days
  • 10 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    13 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • How will the space race affect our environment? (Video 25mins)

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    16 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    10 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Diego

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    11 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 462 Stimmen
    94 Beiträge
    421 Aufrufe
    L
    Make them publishers or whatever is required to have it be a legal requirement, have them ban people who share false information. The law doesn't magically make open discussions not open. By design, social media is open. If discussion from the public is closed, then it's no longer social media. ban people who share false information Banning people doesn't stop falsehoods. It's a broken solution promoting a false assurance. Authorities are still fallible & risk banning over unpopular/debatable expressions that may turn out true. There was unpopular dissent over covid lockdown policies in the US despite some dramatic differences with EU policies. Pro-palestinian protests get cracked down. Authorities are vulnerable to biases & swayed. Moreover, when people can just share their falsehoods offline, attempting to ban them online is hard to justify. If print media, through its decline, is being held legally responsible Print media is a controlled medium that controls it writers & approves everything before printing. It has a prepared, coordinated message. They can & do print books full of falsehoods if they want. Social media is open communication where anyone in the entire public can freely post anything before it is revoked. They aren't claiming to spread the truth, merely to enable communication.
  • Dear Brother Printers: Eat a [Sponsor friendly words here]

    Technology technology
    2
    1 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    19 Aufrufe
    A
    Why doesn't Amazon just sell a generic printer that works with generic toner or pigment or ink. I would buy.