Skip to content

You can still enable uBlock Origin in Chrome, here is how

Technology
127 95 22
  • 3 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Apple appeals EU's €500M fine over App Store payment restraints

    Technology technology
    3
    1
    21 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    30 Aufrufe
    zak@lemmy.worldZ
    It's likely their priority is continuing to collect all the fees they can for as long as they can rather than the fine itself.
  • I made a porn scroller without the clutter

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    4 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    20 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 42 Stimmen
    11 Beiträge
    75 Aufrufe
    P
    That takes zero ingenuity.
  • 211 Stimmen
    17 Beiträge
    90 Aufrufe
    A
    When it comes to public outreach, the question is more “why not?”
  • Hacker Tactic: ESD Diodes

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    24 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    12 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Resurrecting a dead torrent tracker and finding 3 million peers

    Technology technology
    59
    321 Stimmen
    59 Beiträge
    297 Aufrufe
    I
    Yeah i suppose any form of payment that you have to keep secret for some reason is a reason to use crypto, though I struggle to imagine needing that if you're not doing something dodgy imagine you’re a YouTuber and want to accept donations: that will force you to give out your name to them, which they could use to get your address and phone number. There’s always someone that hates you, and I rather not have them knowing my personal info Wat. Crypto is not good at solving that, it's in fact much much worse than traditional payment methods. There's a reason scammers always want to be paid in crypto if you’re the seller then it’s a lot better. With the traditional banking system, with enough knowledge you can cheat both sides: stolen cards, abusive chargebacks, bank accounts in other countries under fake name/fake ID… Crypto simplifies scamming when the seller, and pretty much makes it impossible for buyers What specifically are you boycotting? Card payments, international tranfers, national transfers taking days to complete, money being seizable at all times many banks lose money on them Their plans are basically all focused on the card you get. Pretty sure they make money with it, else many wouldn’t offer cash back (selling infos and getting a fee from card payments?) if you think the people that benefit from you using crypto (crypto exchange owners and billionaires that own crypto etc.) are less evil than goverment regulated banks, you're deluded. Banks are evil anyways, does it really change anything? The difference is that it technically helps everyone using crypto, not only the rich. Plus P2P exchanges are a thing You'll spend more money using crypto for that, not less That’s just factually false. Do you know the price of a swift transfer? Now compare it to crypto tx fees, with many being under $0.01
  • 40 Stimmen
    10 Beiträge
    55 Aufrufe
    T
    Clearly the author doesn't understand how capitalism works. If Apple can pick you up by the neck, turn you upside down, and shake whatever extra money it can from you then it absolutely will do so. The problem is that one indie developer doesn't have any power over Apple... so they can go fuck themselves. The developer is granted the opportunity to grovel at the feet of their betters (richers) and pray that they are allowed to keep enough of their own crop to survive the winter. If they don't survive... then some other dev will probably jump at the chance to take part in the "free market" and demonstrate their worth.