Skip to content

Fairphone announces the €599 Fairphone 6, with a 6.31" 120Hz LTPO OLED display, a Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 chip, and enhanced modularity with 12 swappable parts

Technology
555 240 2.8k
  • Headphone jack is e-waste

    you can use the usb C headphones

    What the absolute fuck are you talking about? What am I supposed to do with the dozen wired headphones I already have? Some of them decades old? Throw them in the garbage? Sounds real eco-friendly.

    bluetooth audio is great

    It is. We had it on phones since before the original iPhone. No one wants to take that away.

    Problem is BT headphones last 2 years then they go in the garbage because the batteries are dead. How eco-friendly is that!?

    You can use your dozen wired headphones you already have with a $10 usb-c -> 3.5mm adapter.

  • I hope you’re not suggesting that people store all of their photos and movies and stuff on their phones SD card and SD card only……

    SD cards are absurdly volatile and prone to corruption.

  • The Sony form factor is the best on the market IMO. You can hold it in you hand and get more screen in the height.

    They’re really no different to a regular iPhone or iPhone pro in terms of size.

  • I use them and that's more than reason enough to want a reliable, small, cheap, jack that literally has no downsides and lets me use my devices how I want to use them.

    Unless you want to use them with a device that doesn’t have a headphone jack.

  • For $700 I'm not interested in compromising my own convenience for theirs.

    Then you’re going to have to go and start your own phone company. Good luck to you, let us know when your phone comes out.

  • These points were all disproved long ago. The jack is a the same thickness as the display.

    The reason is because BT headphones have a much higher margin, and need to be replaced every few years because of the battery (if not already replaced because they were lost or damaged).

    It's just a dumb cash grab.

    This would make sense if the only Bluetooth headphones that worked with the phone were made by the same company, but alas, that’s not how it works.

    The reason they don’t have a headphone jack anymore is because it’s easier to make without it, saves money, has a built in replacement in BT, and people overwhelmingly love BT headphones due to being wireless.

  • You can - Samsung phones are really well supported for that.

    **Snapdragon 8 gen 2 enters the chat..

  • Headphone jack is e-waste

    you can use the usb C headphones

    What the absolute fuck are you talking about? What am I supposed to do with the dozen wired headphones I already have? Some of them decades old? Throw them in the garbage? Sounds real eco-friendly.

    bluetooth audio is great

    It is. We had it on phones since before the original iPhone. No one wants to take that away.

    Problem is BT headphones last 2 years then they go in the garbage because the batteries are dead. How eco-friendly is that!?

    Problem is BT headphones last 2 years then they go in the garbage because the batteries are dead. How eco-friendly is that!?

    My 7 years old bluetooth headphone would disagree.

    It is. We had it on phones since before the original iPhone. No one wants to take that away.

    And no one except a vocal minority want to keep it. There are a lot on data on that, and manufacturer make their decision on that data.

    But lets ignore that, and let's take my viewpoint as a customer. I don't want a port I have no use for. I don't want a DAC I have no use for. I don't want the extra weight that comes with them.

    My needs conflict with yours, so what's the only way to make both of us somewhat happy? That's by making the 3.5mm jack an addon, which is what any manufacturer that does not focus on music listening would do.

  • Why should they care?

    Because they should want to capture more customers? Is that really your question?

    The point is, the people who did buy it didn’t care

    Yeah and how many were those?

    Exactly, they want the most amount of customers. But they won't sacrifice AxB customers to satisfy B customers. They'd be effectively losing customers or breaking even at a higher cost to them.

    We know this numbers must have a population of around 180 thousand customers. The known number of fairphones sold across all models so far. Now let's make assumptions. Let's suppose that there are 100 people who want headphone jacks and would absolutely buy a fairphone if they came with it, for each user that has advocated for headphone jacks in this thread. You wouldn't even break 1% of the total number of fairphone sales, just this year (130k).

    Again, there's a difference between wanting something a lot. And actually making decisions based on what we say we want. Fairphone removed the headphone jack on a model that broke sales records for them. Fairphone 5 was heavily criticized for not having a headphone jack. And it is selling comfortably well within their expectations. So obviously the people who stopped buying Fairphones because of the headphone jack weren't that many actually.

  • I wish I could ditch stock android but my business bank app refuses to run on e/os and I assume I'd have the same problem with graphene.

    e/os was otherwise soo much better, and the increase in performance and battery life was huge.

    I assume I'd have the same problem with graphene.

    There's a list of bank apps that work in Grapheme. You can check for yours here

  • how many people care about the source of the materials?

    Far too few I'm afraid

  • Are we forgetting that companies also have their own bias to make the decisions that increase overall profits? They lost buyers (me included) by this change, but they made up the difference by selling higher margin accessories. Companies will only cater to users if it aligns with turning a bigger profit. If adding an anti-feature is better for the bottom line, then that's how it goes. Enshittification doesn't happen accidentally, but by pushing the boundaries of what the users tolerate.

    No, we aren't forgetting. Precisely because they are a corporation driven by profits like any other, they will do what sells units. It actually goes against the argument for headphone jacks. It is an admission that the people who vocally want phones with headphone jacks don't buy phones (even if they have headphone jacks) and are an statistically insignificant amount of people. My original point. You are vocal, but disingenuous (perhaps not on purpose).

    Fairphone catered to the mass market with the Fairphone 4 (and removed the headphone jack) and broke their own sales records. Sorry, that's just the truth. What you want is against the grain of the rest of the market. Yes, even the market who want repairable modular phones.

    Because when push comes to shove, you might want the headphone jack but it doesn't drive your purchase decision. And that's the important part. As an example, another person on this very thread asked what phone with a headphone jack is good, someone else gave a suggestion and immediately got the reply.

    I considered that phone, but it didn't have an OLED screen, so I didn't buy it.

    Admitting that — despite being very vocal about wanting the headphone jack — that feature is actually low in their own list of decision making priorities. At the very least it is below screen quality. Raising the question, where should a profit driven company choose to invest money in when presented with that customer?

    In marketing, people are usually very vocal about things that actually don't influence their own purchase decisions. That's just a fact, people are very bad at knowing what they want. That's why you should always observe their behavior, not just ask their opinion. Because a lot of people express opinions they don't uphold with actions.

  • The transfer speed over USB on mine probably doesn't even pass USB 2 speeds anyway and I've had flagship phones in the past that were even slower over a cable. I guess if that's still the case then there's probably a good engineering argument to reduce complexity.

    I just checked my phone and the up/down speed for files is roughly 40MB/s despite having a USB 3 connection.

    USB 2 has a max. transfer rate (under optimal conditions) of 60MB/s, so I think when the phone storage improves a bit or the cable is a bit longer it will likely become a bottleneck.

    Also note that there are other applications than transfering files which might need more bandwidth.

    To be fair it really doesn't make much of a difference but USB 3 is now the standard for a century and has been around since 2008 so I somewhere expect a 600€ phone to also have it.

  • USB 2? What a stupid choice that appears to be. Did they have any reasoning behind that?

    Why does The Fairphone (Gen. 6) use USB-2?

    In order to make the device more affordable, we explored how we could best balance our spec choices with the least possible impact on user experience. Going from USB-3 to USB-2 was one of them.

  • Audio jack isn't an audiophile thing, it's a "I don't want to pay 100$ for headphones thing"

    As for thickness, it doesn't increase thickness. It is simply false, someone even retrofitted a whole audio jack into an iphone.

    Nobody makes q difference between a 4mm and a 4.5mm phone, even if tgey were feature and price parity.

    The reason you are giving here is made up marketing by the phone industry so they can sell earbuds.

    I mean, yes. It is about marketing. I just think there are more people who think wires are annoying than people losing their earbuds. For every person who loses BT earbuds every 3 months, there's a person with the same pair for 3+ years who is perfectly happy with wireless quality. Companies don't care about that. They care about decisions that will reduce costs and increase their profits, and Fairphone desperately need profits. Making phones is idiotically expensive.

  • how many times does the average person use wireless charging? Seriously, I haven't seen anyone do that yet, or know of someone who uses that.

    and yet that's still a major feature in lots of phones

    “It's not in front of my face, so it doesn't exists!”

    That's literally the thinking abilities of a toddler. Wireless chargers sell like hotcakes. MagSafe charger is Apple's most popular accessory in their entire history.

  • Exactly, they want the most amount of customers. But they won't sacrifice AxB customers to satisfy B customers. They'd be effectively losing customers or breaking even at a higher cost to them.

    We know this numbers must have a population of around 180 thousand customers. The known number of fairphones sold across all models so far. Now let's make assumptions. Let's suppose that there are 100 people who want headphone jacks and would absolutely buy a fairphone if they came with it, for each user that has advocated for headphone jacks in this thread. You wouldn't even break 1% of the total number of fairphone sales, just this year (130k).

    Again, there's a difference between wanting something a lot. And actually making decisions based on what we say we want. Fairphone removed the headphone jack on a model that broke sales records for them. Fairphone 5 was heavily criticized for not having a headphone jack. And it is selling comfortably well within their expectations. So obviously the people who stopped buying Fairphones because of the headphone jack weren't that many actually.

    But they won’t sacrifice AxB customers to satisfy B customers.

    That's the kicker. Adding a headphone jack doesn't mean they have to sacrifice something. They can just do it without having to remove/reduce anything. If adding a jack was really that difficult, something like what you can see in this video wouldn't be possible.

    You have to preeeety gullible to believe their reasons for not adding it. The only reason was that they wanted to sell their bluetooth earbuds, that's it.

  • The transfer speed over USB on mine probably doesn't even pass USB 2 speeds anyway and I've had flagship phones in the past that were even slower over a cable. I guess if that's still the case then there's probably a good engineering argument to reduce complexity.

    Or there wasn't good enough engineering to begin with to achieve usb 3 speeds. Seems like they should have got it right before using it as a reason to cripple the thing further.

  • Why does The Fairphone (Gen. 6) use USB-2?

    In order to make the device more affordable, we explored how we could best balance our spec choices with the least possible impact on user experience. Going from USB-3 to USB-2 was one of them.

    Thanks for the link. I can't necessarily agree that it's low impact, transferring files at 2.0 speeds is brutal.

  • You know you've got not argument when you have to compare a $700 dollar phone to a $5 dongle for your argument to even make sense.

    First of all, I seriously doubt any $700 phone without a 3.5mm port is going to have a decent DAC, because there's no reason for it. In those phones the DAC is used primarily for phone calls. If those phones had a a 3.5mm port and they were flagship phones then maybe they would have higher quality DACs in them, but then they'd also cost more. And secondly, I wasn't talking about some cheap $5 dongle, I specifically said quality headphones.

    You know you’ve got not argument when you have to compare a $700 dollar phone to a $5 dongle for your argument to even make sense.

    Oh, so I should buy $100 dongles then? lol Everyone's argument about the dongles is that they're super cheap, that's why I made the comparison.

    In those phones the DAC is used primarily for phone calls.

    Oh really? And how exactly do you think that the phone is generating the audio that comes through its speaker when you're doing anything else? Like listening to music, videos, etc? Does your phone really not make a single sound apart from the audio in phone calls?

    I wasn’t talking about some cheap $5 dongle, I specifically said quality headphones

    headphone =/= dongle

    The dongle is what you connect TO the headphone. Regardless, be more specific then. What's the one you recommend? Should I buy $50 dongles then and keep them attached to my headphones? Since I use 4/5 of them does that mean that it's ok in your opinion that I now need to spend $250 in dongles instead of just having a tiny, cheap, reliable jack on my $700 phone?

  • Rising rocket launches linked to ozone layer thinning

    Technology technology
    26
    1
    215 Stimmen
    26 Beiträge
    198 Aufrufe
    Z
    They cry antisemitism, then the Seven Mountain Mandate people cry antisemitism, yadda yadda yadda...
  • Hire Mean Stack Developers From Spaculus Software

    Technology technology
    1
    2
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    14 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Inside the face scanning tech behind social media age limits

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    25 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    11 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Microsoft’s new genAI model to power agents in Windows 11

    Technology technology
    12
    1
    30 Stimmen
    12 Beiträge
    66 Aufrufe
    ulrich@feddit.orgU
    which one would sell more I mean they would charge a lot of money for the stripped down one because it doesn't allow them to monetize it on the back end, and the vast majority would continue using the resource-slurping ad-riddled one.
  • New Cars Don't All Come With Dipsticks Anymore, Here's Why

    Technology technology
    22
    1
    2 Stimmen
    22 Beiträge
    97 Aufrufe
    L
    The U660F transmission in my wife's 2015 Highlander doesn't have a dipstick. Luckily that transmission is solid and easy to service anyway, you just need a skinny funnel to fill it.
  • Windows Is Adding AI Agents That Can Change Your Settings

    Technology technology
    26
    1
    103 Stimmen
    26 Beiträge
    129 Aufrufe
    T
    Edit: no, wtf am i doing The thread was about inept the coders were. Here is your answer: They were so fucking inept they broke a fundamental function and it made it to production. Then they did it deliberately. That's how inept they are. End of.
  • 0 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    29 Aufrufe
    K
    Only way I'll want a different phone brand is if it comes with ZERO bloatware and has an excellent internal memory/storage cleanse that has nothing to do with Google's Files or a random app I'm not sure I can trust without paying or rooting. So far my A series phones do what I need mostly and in my opinion is superior to the Motorola's my fiancé prefers minus the phone-phone charge ability his has, everything else I'm just glad I have enough control to tweak things to my liking, however these days Samsungs seem to be infested with Google bloatware and apps that insist on opening themselves back up regardless of the widespread battery restrictions I've assigned (even was sent a "Stop Closing my Apps" notif that sent me to an article ) short of Disabling many unnecessary apps bc fully rooting my devices is something I rarely do anymore. I have a random Chinese brand tablet where I actually have more control over the apps than either of my A series phones whee Force Stopping STAYS that way when I tell them to! I hate being listened to for ads and the unwanted draining my battery life and data (I live off-grid and pay data rates because "Unlimited" is some throttled BS) so my ability to control what's going on in the background matters a lot to me, enough that I'm anti Meta-apps and avoid all non-essential Google apps. I can't afford topline phones and the largest data plan, so I work with what I can afford and I'm sad refurbished A lines seem to be getting more expensive while giving away my control to companies. Last A line I bought that was supposed to be my first 5G phone was network locked, so I got ripped off, but it still serves me well in off-grid life. Only app that actually regularly malfunctions when I Force Stop it's background presence is Roku, which I find to have very an almost insidious presence in our lives. Google Play, Chrome, and Spotify never acts incompetent in any way no matter how I have to open the setting every single time I turn Airplane Mode off. Don't need Gmail with Chrome and DuckDuckGo has been awesome at intercepting self-loading ads. I hope one day DDG gets better bc Google seems to be terrible lately and I even caught their AI contradicting itself when asking about if Homo Florensis is considered Human (yes) and then asked the oldest age of human remains, and was fed the outdated narrative of 300,000 years versus 700,000+ years bipedal pre-humans have been carbon dated outside of the Cradle of Humanity in South Africa. SO sorry to go off-topic, but I've got a big gripe with Samsung's partnership with Google, especially considering the launch of Quantum Computed AI that is still being fine-tuned with company-approved censorships.
  • Someone left this review on my free Reddit client rdx for Reddit

    Technology technology
    2
    2
    0 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    23 Aufrufe
    F
    I’m going to give you a five star review to balance it.