Skip to content

YouTube might slow down your videos if you block ads

Technology
226 151 199
  • 624 Stimmen
    73 Beiträge
    23 Aufrufe
    swelter_spark@reddthat.comS
    Swappa is good for tech.
  • How could AI escape human control?

    Technology technology
    5
    6 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    26 Aufrufe
    Z
    Don't mix up country bosses with technology bosses - even if they have the same brain damages.
  • Your smartphone is a parasite, according to evolution

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    9 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 56 Stimmen
    13 Beiträge
    46 Aufrufe
    P
    I tried before, but I made my life hell on earth. I only have whatsapp now because its mandatory. Since 2022, I only have lemmy, mastodon and unfortunately whatsapp as social media.
  • Apple’s Smart Glasses Expected to Hit the Market by Late Next Year!

    Technology technology
    14
    6 Stimmen
    14 Beiträge
    47 Aufrufe
    L
    great, another worthless tech product that no one asked for. I can hardly wait.
  • 92 Stimmen
    42 Beiträge
    14 Aufrufe
    G
    You don’t understand. The tracking and spying is the entire point of the maneuver. The ‘children are accessing porn’ thing is just a Trojan horse to justify the spying. I understand what are you saying, I simply don't consider to check if a law is applied as a Trojan horse in itself. I would agree if the EU had said to these sites "give us all the the access log, a list of your subscriber, every data you gather and a list of every IP it ever connected to your site", and even this way does not imply that with only the IP you could know who the user is without even asking the telecom company for help. So, is it a Trojan horse ? Maybe, it heavily depend on how the EU want to do it. If they just ask "show me how you try to avoid that a minor access your material", which normally is the fist step, I don't see how it could be a Trojan horse. It could become, I agree on that. As you pointed out, it’s already illegal for them to access it, and parents are legally required to prevent their children from accessing it. No, parents are not legally required to prevent it. The seller (or provider) is legally required. It is a subtle but important difference. But you don’t lock down the entire population, or institute pre-crime surveillance policies, just because some parents are not going to follow the law. True. You simply impose laws that make mandatories for the provider to check if he can sell/serve something to someone. I mean asking that the cashier of mall check if I am an adult when I buy a bottle of wine is no different than asking to Pornhub to check if the viewer is an adult. I agree that in one case is really simple and in the other is really hard (and it is becoming harder by the day). You then charge the guilty parents after the offense. Ok, it would work, but then how do you caught the offendind parents if not checking what everyone do ? Is it not simpler to try to prevent it instead ?
  • Small (web) is beautiful

    Technology technology
    6
    1
    0 Stimmen
    6 Beiträge
    14 Aufrufe
    fredselfish@lemmy.worldF
    Will do thank you.
  • Stack overflow is almost dead

    Technology technology
    5
    0 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    23 Aufrufe
    ineedmana@lemmy.worldI
    students When I was a student I despised the idea of typeless var in C#. Then a few years later at my day job I fully embraced C++ auto. I understand the frustration but unfortunately being wrong is part of learning