Skip to content

YouTube might slow down your videos if you block ads

Technology
226 151 249
  • 242 Stimmen
    48 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    mentaledge@sopuli.xyzM
    Superpowered lying is already a thing, and all we needed was demographic data and context control. Today, it is possible to get a population to believe almost anything. Show them the right argument, at the right time, in the right context, and they believe it. Facebook and google have scaled up exactly that into their main sources of revenue. Same goes for attention hacking. AI generated content designed to hook viewers functions in entirely predictable, and fairly well understood ways. And the same goes for the algorithms which "recommend" additional content based on what someone is watching. As for why doctors can't do things AIs are pulling off, I'd suggest that's because current systems are using indicators we don't know about, which they aren't sentient enough to explain. If they could, I have no doubt a human doctor, given enough time, could learn about, and detect, such indicators. There is no evidence that what these models are doing, is "beyond our scale of thinking". But again, I do think the machine will be faster. Current models display "emergent capabilities", as in abilities we don't know about before the model is created and tested. But once it is created, we can and have figured out what it is doing and how.
  • Bumble's AI icebreakers are mainly breaking EU law

    Technology technology
    18
    1
    184 Stimmen
    18 Beiträge
    54 Aufrufe
    S
    This is just that zizek quote
  • 327 Stimmen
    64 Beiträge
    152 Aufrufe
    B
    I get that, but it's more logical to me that of I'm going to whistleblow on a company to not use one of their devices to do it. That way it doesn't matter what apps are or are not secure, you're not using their device that can potentially track you.
  • Sitting up and waiting.

    Technology technology
    7
    5 Stimmen
    7 Beiträge
    27 Aufrufe
    A
    What new AI slop hell is this?
  • 68 Stimmen
    17 Beiträge
    58 Aufrufe
    H
    Set up arrs, you basically set it and forget it.
  • Anker is recalling over 1.1 million power banks due to fire risks

    Technology technology
    19
    1
    209 Stimmen
    19 Beiträge
    52 Aufrufe
    B
    Thanks man! Really appreciate the type up! Have a great weekend!
  • 278 Stimmen
    100 Beiträge
    138 Aufrufe
    F
    It's not just skills, it's also capital investment.
  • Why Japan's animation industry has embraced AI

    Technology technology
    12
    1
    1 Stimmen
    12 Beiträge
    49 Aufrufe
    R
    The genre itself has become neutered, too. A lot of anime series have the usual "anime elements" and a couple custom ideas. And similar style, too glossy for my taste. OK, what I think is old and boring libertarian stuff, I'll still spell it out. The reason people are having such problems is because groups and businesses are de facto legally enshrined in their fields, it's almost like feudal Europe's system of privileges and treaties. At some point I thought this is good, I hope no evil god decided to fulfill my wish. There's no movement, and a faction (like Disney with Star Wars) that buys a place (a brand) can make any garbage, and people will still try to find the depth in it and justify it (that complaint has been made about Star Wars prequels, but no, they are full of garbage AND have consistent arcs, goals and ideas, which is why they revitalized the Expanded Universe for almost a decade, despite Lucas-<companies> having sort of an internal social collapse in year 2005 right after Revenge of the Sith being premiered ; I love the prequels, despite all the pretense and cringe, but their verbal parts are almost fillers, their cinematographic language and matching music are flawless, the dialogue just disrupts it all while not adding much, - I think Lucas should have been more decisive, a bit like Tartakovsky with the Clone Wars cartoon, just more serious, because non-verbal doesn't equal stupid). OK, my thought wandered away. Why were the legal means they use to keep such positions created? To make the economy nicer to the majority, to writers, to actors, to producers. Do they still fulfill that role? When keeping monopolies, even producing garbage or, lately, AI slop, - no. Do we know a solution? Not yet, because pressing for deregulation means the opponent doing a judo movement and using that energy for deregulating the way everything becomes worse. Is that solution in minimizing and rebuilding the system? I believe still yes, nothing is perfect, so everything should be easy to quickly replace, because errors and mistakes plaguing future generations will inevitably continue to be made. The laws of the 60s were simple enough for that in most countries. The current laws are not. So the general direction to be taken is still libertarian. Is this text useful? Of course not. I just think that in the feudal Europe metaphor I'd want to be a Hussite or a Cossack or at worst a Venetian trader.