Skip to content

YouTube is now flagging accounts on Premium family plans that aren't in the same household

Technology
214 133 7
  • 802 Stimmen
    198 Beiträge
    28 Aufrufe
    G
    Proven? To whom? Never heard about people killed in crash caused by drunken driver ? Or pedestrians hit by cars driven by drunked drivers ? Excessive alcoholism is known to cause harm. Should we make being an alcoholic illegal? Wouldn’t that make it harder for alcoholicsnto try to get help, for fear of being arrested instead of getting help, much like what happens to drug addicts? No, we should just have laws try to avoid consequences for others Are you an alcoholic ? Ok, we will help you to be ok but at the same time we try to avoid you drive while drunk. It not seems too unreasonable People get hurt constantly while fishing, too. Should we make fishing illegal? Point is: how probable is that someone fishing hurts someone else ? How much damage you can do ? Again, the point is not to make something illegal because you can hurt yourself, it is about trying to have law that try to prevent you hurt someone else while doing something. If fishing can hurt others, maybe we should have a law that, while not forbidding to fish, protect the others from what you are doing. I would imagine that you would not like to swim in the sea while someone is fishing with bombs (illegal) 2 meters away from you, don't you ? The problem is where do we draw the line. You want to draw it at some possibility of harm to others. I want to draw it at actual harm to others. Fine as long as you accept the consequences. I just don't agree with you. Which of these is more or less likely to wind up being stretched over time? Both, because you just need to redefine what "harm" means. And some people is good to do it.
  • 1k Stimmen
    222 Beiträge
    2k Aufrufe
    boor@lemmy.worldB
    Similar experience here. I recently took the official Google “prompting essentials” course. I kept an open mind and modest expectations; this is a tool that’s here to stay. Best to just approach it as the next Microsoft Word and see how it can add practical value. The biggest thing I learned is that getting quality outputs will require at least a paragraph-long, thoughtful prompt and 15 minutes of iteration. If I can DIY in less than 30 minutes, the LLM is probably not worth the trouble. I’m still trying to find use cases (I don’t code), but it often just feels like a solution in search of a problem….
  • 16 Stimmen
    12 Beiträge
    40 Aufrufe
    lime@feddit.nuL
    you should probably also check out beaker browser then, it's also trying to blur the line. personally i don't know if there is an actual benefit. most people seem content not producing things in fields they're not interested in. we'll never be able to get everyone on board with making websites no matter how simple the interface, just like we'll never be able to get everyone on board with gardening or carpentry. if you want to do it, you will learn. if you don't the learning curve is not the problem.
  • 0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    5 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Ex-Google CEO: Power Grid Crisis Could Kill AI's Next Big Leap

    Technology technology
    20
    1
    115 Stimmen
    20 Beiträge
    278 Aufrufe
    S
    Our CPUs and GPUs are many orders of magnitude simpler than our brains. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/100-trillion-connections/ But I largely agree! We need to optimize software. OTOH, some of the smartest people in IT have been working on this, who are we to second guess them.
  • Role of Email Deliverability Consulting in ROI

    Technology technology
    1
    2
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    25 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 256 Stimmen
    67 Beiträge
    2k Aufrufe
    L
    Maybe you're right: is there verification? Neither content policy (youtube or tiktok) clearly lays out rules on those words. I only find unverified claims: some write it started at YouTube, others claim TikTok. They claim YouTube demonetizes & TikTok shadowbans. They generally agree content restrictions by these platforms led to the propagation of circumspect shit like unalive & SA. TikTok policy outlines their moderation methods, which include removal and ineligibility to the for you feed. Given their policy on self-harm & automated removal of potential violations, their policy is to effectively & recklessly censor such language. Generally, censorship is suppression of expression. Censorship doesn't exclusively mean content removal, though they're doing that, too. (Digression: revisionism & whitewashing are forms of censorship.) Regardless of how they censor or induce self-censorship, they're chilling inoffensive language pointlessly. While as private entities they are free to moderate as they please, it's unnecessary & the effect is an obnoxious affront on self-expression that's contorting language for the sake of avoiding idiotic restrictions.
  • 31 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    24 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet