Our Channel Could Be Deleted - Gamers Nexus
-
This post did not contain any content.
While I appreciate a lot of the stuff that Gamers Nexus does, Steve is so, so insufferable.
-
This post did not contain any content.
I don't watch his channel, but from here it seems like he is in a "rage" spiral. Like being a bit unpleasant and when people respond to that he doubles down going fro just a bit to kind of an ass
-
I don't watch his channel, but from here it seems like he is in a "rage" spiral. Like being a bit unpleasant and when people respond to that he doubles down going fro just a bit to kind of an ass
Ive also only seen a few videos of his over the last few years but it seems like he's recently had some wildly successful videos based off exposing corruption in the PC/tech industry and has morphed his channel from tech reviews to some sort of investigative journalism chasing that high he got from said viral videos.
-
Yes, that's the problem.
-
Oh no, no more YouTube tech drama
It's not YouTube drama, it's international trade drama.
-
Not after you lose your channel and all your income. PeerTube doesn't appeal to people who make a living at this because there's no revenue stream.
Sometimes it ain't about the revenue stream.
-
I would like to see more content relating to the last interview in the video with Mr. Pigeon. Truly think he has great arguments that need further airtime
No! I'm sick of these influencers giving a platform to fascist birds. Enough is enough! #cancelmrpigeon
-
Ive also only seen a few videos of his over the last few years but it seems like he's recently had some wildly successful videos based off exposing corruption in the PC/tech industry and has morphed his channel from tech reviews to some sort of investigative journalism chasing that high he got from said viral videos.
Is that supposed to be a abd thing?
-
but seems it isn't completed yet
I feel like this site needs more attention.
-
Is that supposed to be a abd thing?
No, i don't really have an opinion either way.
-
I don't watch his channel, but from here it seems like he is in a "rage" spiral. Like being a bit unpleasant and when people respond to that he doubles down going fro just a bit to kind of an ass
Yeah it's strange why more people don't just give into corporate greed and losing ownership of their channels when they discuss potential (obvious) corruption.
Upsetting that they would react in a negative way!
-
Nebula is a shithole, just have a glance at their privacy policy.
Floatplane would be ideal but I think he burned that bridge.
PeerTube is probably his best bet.
I don't want to see his channel deleted but I'm also VERY interested in what would take place in the aftermath...
Elaborate? Genuinely asking.. what is your key takeaways for "it's a shit hole"?
-
Ive also only seen a few videos of his over the last few years but it seems like he's recently had some wildly successful videos based off exposing corruption in the PC/tech industry and has morphed his channel from tech reviews to some sort of investigative journalism chasing that high he got from said viral videos.
Chasing the high? You think that is why he does that? Sit down and think ..THINK what you just said .. according to you his motivation is some junky high chase?
-
I don't watch his channel, but from here it seems like he is in a "rage" spiral. Like being a bit unpleasant and when people respond to that he doubles down going fro just a bit to kind of an ass
"I don't watch his channel but let me give an opinion ". Are you stupid or something? If you know little to nothing about a topic educate yourself or shut your mouth you muppet. He has the balls to go against giants and has had success at it. Rossman is the same. You can't play nice guy against asshole corporations. What was the last win you had in consumer advocacy? You ass..
-
Ive also only seen a few videos of his over the last few years but it seems like he's recently had some wildly successful videos based off exposing corruption in the PC/tech industry and has morphed his channel from tech reviews to some sort of investigative journalism chasing that high he got from said viral videos.
The only high he's chasing is a money one. Controversy brings clicks.
-
How is his channel going to be deleted? They appealed the take down and YouTube will reinstate the video in a matter of 10 days if Bloomberg failed to produce proof that he used their copy right shit. I'm actually genuinely asking because I watched the whole video and Steve didn't say anything about their channel being deleted.
3 dmca/copyright strikes on a channel and yt deletes you. It was mentioned near the beginning of the video.
-
Chasing the high? You think that is why he does that? Sit down and think ..THINK what you just said .. according to you his motivation is some junky high chase?
At the end of the day he's running a business and has had lots of financial success with this type of "product," so it makes sense to focus your efforts on said product going forward.
I like that he's exposing corruption, but question his motivations and use of clickbait. I'm not really passing judgement on him either way and things don't always have to be black and white, "good" or "bad."
Do you have something to add? Asking if my stated opinion is "what I think" in three different ways isn't really contributing much to the conversation.
-
Sometimes it ain't about the revenue stream.
Except for these people, it almost definitely is. They have staff, an office, inventory to manage, etc. Most YouTubers nowadays aren't just operating on their own, and thus have financial expenses outside of just paying themselves for their own labor, that can't just keep going if their revenue stream goes down, or even just takes a large enough cut.
It's unfortunate, but that's just how a lot of the content creation industry works right now, especially on YouTube.
-
Ive also only seen a few videos of his over the last few years but it seems like he's recently had some wildly successful videos based off exposing corruption in the PC/tech industry and has morphed his channel from tech reviews to some sort of investigative journalism chasing that high he got from said viral videos.
He goes into detail on some of the videos, but to summarize the "controversial" videos due less well when it comes to recouping the money it takes to film them (if at all). They (often):
- have to account for more travel expenses to interview people
- can't be sponsored since no one wants to sign up for those kinds of pieces and depend on ad revenue alone
- can include additional legal costs (have lawyers review things, etc. )
- for things that are time sensitive, they can also mess with the work life balance of the team and the regularly scheduled content they've been working on
- stress from dealing with mega corps with the money to ruin you as a side quest
-
Sometimes it ain't about the revenue stream.
GN is literally a sizable business, it absolutely is.
-
-
YouTube just quietly blocked Adblock Plus — the internet hasn't noticed yet, but I've found a workaround
Technology1
-
Twitter founder Jack Dorsey pumps $10 million into a nonprofit to build Nostr-based social media apps
Technology1
-
-
The Department of Defense Efforts to Buy and Maintain IT Systems Are Billions Over Budget and Delayed
Technology1
-
-
-