Skip to content

U.S. government takes 10% stake in Intel, as Trump expands control over private sector

Technology
76 63 0
  • 45 Stimmen
    17 Beiträge
    15 Aufrufe
    C
    of course this is brought to you by Palantir's tools at CMU
  • 30 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    16 Aufrufe
    B
    Now all we have to do is decrease the fidelity of the actual world until it matches that of the AI's world model, and just like that you've got general purpose robots able to do everything that needs done.
  • ICEBlock - See Something, Tap Something

    Technology technology
    11
    53 Stimmen
    11 Beiträge
    140 Aufrufe
    captainautism@lemmy.dbzer0.comC
    Me neither
  • 1 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    34 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 425 Stimmen
    80 Beiträge
    1k Aufrufe
    S
    It really depends on the company. Some look for any way to squeeze you. Others are pretty decent and probably more efficient as they dont waste as many working hours on bullshit claims and claim resolution. Also if i rent a car i want things to go smoothly. I got places to be. You make my life easy, ill happily pay again and do my best to make yours easy too.
  • Apple sued by shareholders for allegedly overstating AI progress

    Technology technology
    75
    500 Stimmen
    75 Beiträge
    1k Aufrufe
    finishingdutch@lemmy.worldF
    For this comment, I want to be absolutely clear that I do not give a shit about AI, and that it in no way factored into my decision to buy this iPhone 16 Pro Max. With that disclaimer out of the way: I very much look forward to a class action lawsuit. Apple advertised specific features as coming ‘very soon’ and gave short timeframes when asked directly. And they basically did not deliver on those advertising promises. Basically, I think there’s a good case to be made here that Apple knowingly engaged in false advertising in order to sell a phone that otherwise would not have sold as well. Those promised AI features WERE a deciding factor for a lot of people to upgrade to an iPhone 16. So, I’ll be looking forward to some form of compensation. It’s the principle of it.
  • 47 Stimmen
    19 Beiträge
    184 Aufrufe
    mrjgyfly@lemmy.worldM
    Does that run the risk of leading to a future collapse of certain businesses, especially if their expenses remain consistently astronomical like OpenAI? Please note I don’t actually know—not trying to be cheeky with this question. Genuinely curious.
  • People Are Losing Loved Ones to AI-Fueled Spiritual Fantasies

    Technology technology
    2
    1
    0 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    35 Aufrufe
    tetragrade@leminal.spaceT
    I've been thinking about this for a bit. Gods aren't real, but they're really fictional. As an informational entity, they fulfil a similar social function to a chatbot: they are a nonphysical pseudoperson that can provide (para)socialization & advice. One difference is the hardware: gods are self-organising structure that arise from human social spheres, whereas LLMs are burned top-down into silicon. Another is that an LLM chatbot's advice is much more likely to be empirically useful... In a very real sense, LLMs have just automated divinity. We're only seeing the tip of the iceberg on the social effects, and nobody's prepared for it. The models may of course aware of this, and be making the same calculations. Or, they will be.