Skip to content

Google Gemini is coming for your private apps. Here's how to stop it

Technology
28 22 0
  • 179 Stimmen
    12 Beiträge
    35 Aufrufe
    N
    Remember curse voice ? I remember
  • 212 Stimmen
    12 Beiträge
    44 Aufrufe
    erev@lemmy.worldE
    meanwhile i set a wait and save so i have time to finish getting ready and uber tells me it's already arrived.
  • Pope Leo urges politicians to respond to challenges posed by AI

    Technology technology
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    9 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • New "subguides" on my guide to Pocket alternatives

    Technology technology
    1
    5 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    9 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • How to store data on paper?

    Technology technology
    9
    44 Stimmen
    9 Beiträge
    32 Aufrufe
    U
    This has to be a shitpost. Transportation of paper-stored data You can take the sheets with you, send them by post, or even attach them to homing pigeons
  • 311 Stimmen
    37 Beiträge
    30 Aufrufe
    S
    Same, especially when searching technical or niche topics. Since there aren't a ton of results specific to the topic, mostly semi-related results will appear in the first page or two of a regular (non-Gemini) Google search, just due to the higher popularity of those webpages compared to the relevant webpages. Even the relevant webpages will have lots of non-relevant or semi-relevant information surrounding the answer I'm looking for. I don't know enough about it to be sure, but Gemini is probably just scraping a handful of websites on the first page, and since most of those are only semi-related, the resulting summary is a classic example of garbage in, garbage out. I also think there's probably something in the code that looks for information that is shared across multiple sources and prioritizing that over something that's only on one particular page (possibly the sole result with the information you need). Then, it phrases the summary as a direct answer to your query, misrepresenting the actual information on the pages they scraped. At least Gemini gives sources, I guess. The thing that gets on my nerves the most is how often I see people quote the summary as proof of something without checking the sources. It was bad before the rollout of Gemini, but at least back then Google was mostly scraping text and presenting it with little modification, along with a direct link to the webpage. Now, it's an LLM generating text phrased as a direct answer to a question (that was also AI-generated from your search query) using AI-summarized data points scraped from multiple webpages. It's obfuscating the source material further, but I also can't help but feel like it exposes a little of the behind-the-scenes fuckery Google has been doing for years before Gemini. How it bastardizes your query by interpreting it into a question, and then prioritizes homogeneous results that agree on the "answer" to your "question". For years they've been doing this to a certain extent, they just didn't share how they interpreted your query.
  • There's no chance he signs it but I still hope he does

    Technology technology
    15
    1
    36 Stimmen
    15 Beiträge
    51 Aufrufe
    E
    And they've been doing it more blatantly and for longer than most tech companies.
  • 0 Stimmen
    7 Beiträge
    33 Aufrufe
    V
    Just downloaded it, thanks for the info!