Skip to content

Is Matrix cooked?

Technology
54 27 60
  • 209 Stimmen
    11 Beiträge
    46 Aufrufe
    K
    And yet so many people still refusing to switch to Signal, even tho Whatsapp is officially declared unsave by the government.
  • 28 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    20 Aufrufe
    H
    Looks like it hasn't exactly been actively developed since 2022: https://github.com/BoostIO/BoostNote-App/commits/master/
  • 778 Stimmen
    396 Beiträge
    971 Aufrufe
    52fighters@lemmy.sdf.org5
    You are more than welcome to cite the actual Geneva convention to show where I'm wrong.
  • Meta publishes V-Jepa 2 – an AI world model

    Technology technology
    3
    1
    9 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    22 Aufrufe
    K
    Yay more hype. Just what we needed more of, it's hype, at last
  • A ban on state AI laws could smash Big Tech’s legal guardrails

    Technology technology
    10
    1
    121 Stimmen
    10 Beiträge
    39 Aufrufe
    P
    It's always been "states rights" to enrich rulers at the expense of everyone else.
  • autofocus glasses

    Technology technology
    53
    1
    126 Stimmen
    53 Beiträge
    95 Aufrufe
    M
    Hm. Checking my glasses I think there is something on the top too. I can see distance ever so slightly clearer looking out the top. If I remember right, I have a minus .25 in one eye. Always been told it didn't need correction, but maybe it is in this pair. I should go get some off the shelf progressive readers and try those.
  • 92 Stimmen
    42 Beiträge
    14 Aufrufe
    G
    You don’t understand. The tracking and spying is the entire point of the maneuver. The ‘children are accessing porn’ thing is just a Trojan horse to justify the spying. I understand what are you saying, I simply don't consider to check if a law is applied as a Trojan horse in itself. I would agree if the EU had said to these sites "give us all the the access log, a list of your subscriber, every data you gather and a list of every IP it ever connected to your site", and even this way does not imply that with only the IP you could know who the user is without even asking the telecom company for help. So, is it a Trojan horse ? Maybe, it heavily depend on how the EU want to do it. If they just ask "show me how you try to avoid that a minor access your material", which normally is the fist step, I don't see how it could be a Trojan horse. It could become, I agree on that. As you pointed out, it’s already illegal for them to access it, and parents are legally required to prevent their children from accessing it. No, parents are not legally required to prevent it. The seller (or provider) is legally required. It is a subtle but important difference. But you don’t lock down the entire population, or institute pre-crime surveillance policies, just because some parents are not going to follow the law. True. You simply impose laws that make mandatories for the provider to check if he can sell/serve something to someone. I mean asking that the cashier of mall check if I am an adult when I buy a bottle of wine is no different than asking to Pornhub to check if the viewer is an adult. I agree that in one case is really simple and in the other is really hard (and it is becoming harder by the day). You then charge the guilty parents after the offense. Ok, it would work, but then how do you caught the offendind parents if not checking what everyone do ? Is it not simpler to try to prevent it instead ?
  • 299 Stimmen
    9 Beiträge
    36 Aufrufe
    kolanaki@pawb.socialK
    Internet access should be a utility like electricity and water until all three, along with housing, medicine, and food, can be free to all.