Skip to content

Jury orders Tesla to pay more than $200 million in Autopilot crash case

Technology
20 16 1
  • Getting Started with Ebitengine (Go game engine)

    Technology technology
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    3 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Website Development: Building Your Digital Presence

    Technology technology
    1
    2
    1 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    11 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • New Google AdSense Fill Empty In-Page Ads

    Technology technology
    2
    1
    22 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    35 Aufrufe
    S
    I've not seen an ad in years, so they can try to monetize me but will fail spectacularly
  • 2 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    18 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Here's your first look at the rebooted Digg | TechCrunch

    Technology technology
    59
    1
    110 Stimmen
    59 Beiträge
    463 Aufrufe
    M
    Digg has been basically dead for 15 years.
  • Mergulhe em Aventuras Digitais com a MerwomanPG

    Technology technology
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    17 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 168 Stimmen
    11 Beiträge
    101 Aufrufe
    A
    Law enforcement officer
  • CrowdStrike Announces Layoffs Affecting 500 Employees

    Technology technology
    8
    1
    242 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    69 Aufrufe
    S
    This is where the magic of near meaningless corpo-babble comes in. The layoffs are part of a plan to aspirationally acheive the goal of $10b revenue by EoY 2025. What they are actually doing is a significant restructuring of the company, refocusing by outside hiring some amount of new people to lead or be a part of departments or positions that haven't existed before, or are being refocused to other priorities... ... But this process also involves laying off 500 of the 'least productive' or 'least mission critical' employees. So, technically, they can, and are, arguing that their new organizational paradigm will be so succesful that it actually will result in increased revenue, not just lower expenses. Generally corpos call this something like 'right-sizing' or 'refocusing' or something like that. ... But of course... anyone with any actual experience with working at a place that does this... will tell you roughly this is what happens: Turns out all those 'grunts' you let go of, well they actually do a lot more work in a bunch of weird, esoteric, bandaid solutions to keep everything going, than upper management was aware of... because middle management doesn't acknowledge or often even understand that that work was being done, because they are generally self-aggrandizing narcissist petty tyrants who spend more time in meetings fluffing themselves up than actually doing any useful management. Then, also, you are now bringing on new, outside people who look great on paper, to lead new or modified apartments... but they of course also do not have any institutional knowledge, as they are new. So now, you have a whole bunch of undocumented work that was being done, processes which were being followed... which is no longer being done, which is not documented.... and the new guys, even if they have the best intentions, now have to spend a quarter or two or three figuring out just exactly how much pre-existing middle management has been bullshitting about, figuring out just how much things do not actually function as they ssid it did... So now your efficiency improving restructuring is actually a chaotic mess. ... Now, this 'right sizing' is not always apocalyptically extremely bad, but it is also essentially never totally free from hiccups... and it increases stress, workload, and tensions between basically everyone at the company, to some extent. Here's Forbes explanation of this phenomenon, if you prefer an explanation of right sizing in corpospeak: https://www.forbes.com/advisor/business/rightsizing/