Skip to content

Rule34 blocked the UK entirely rather than comply due to the new law.

Technology
180 110 4.8k
  • X Stuck Paying Fees to Arbitrate With Laid Off Twitter Workers

    Technology technology
    2
    1
    25 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    17 Aufrufe
    E
    X Stuck Paying Fees to Arbitrate With Laid Off X Workers
  • Bluesky age verification in the UK

    Technology technology
    7
    19 Stimmen
    7 Beiträge
    34 Aufrufe
    3dcadmin@lemmy.relayeasy.com3
    Yup - I like the fediverse too, but I have plenty of clients who don't. Plenty tried Bluesky, most have left. They all seem to be going towards (shudder) threads now
  • A leap toward lighter, sleeker mixed reality displays

    Technology technology
    9
    1
    41 Stimmen
    9 Beiträge
    70 Aufrufe
    E
    I actually think this is the only way forward past phones. All the AI assistant tools, voice controlled speakers, foldable devices don't really change how we use 99% of the software. VR/AR, when (if?) finally done right will change that.
  • After BlackSuit is taken down, new ransomware group Chaos emerges

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    30 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    16 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 55 Stimmen
    13 Beiträge
    81 Aufrufe
    muusemuuse@sh.itjust.worksM
    Oracle?! You have money and power and everyone hanging on you and you chose ORACLE?! How can anyone take this seriously?!
  • Why front-end development will persist

    Technology technology
    2
    1
    19 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    37 Aufrufe
    H
    An LLM has “zero context” about your project’s specific stack and style guidelines. In other words, an AI might produce a generic <Modal> component, but integrating it into your app’s unique architecture is still a human task. This is very old. Nowadays, in Copilot for example, you add files to context and tell "hey look how I did that thing there, do this new thing following the same structure, with the same naming conventions" and it's enough. And tools like Cursor just throw your whole project into context by default.
  • 115 Stimmen
    22 Beiträge
    360 Aufrufe
    omegalemmy@discuss.onlineO
    American individualism is when you believe everyone is as bad as you or worse Self-fulfilling prophecy when they never want to cooperate in fear of being ripped off
  • 92 Stimmen
    42 Beiträge
    409 Aufrufe
    G
    You don’t understand. The tracking and spying is the entire point of the maneuver. The ‘children are accessing porn’ thing is just a Trojan horse to justify the spying. I understand what are you saying, I simply don't consider to check if a law is applied as a Trojan horse in itself. I would agree if the EU had said to these sites "give us all the the access log, a list of your subscriber, every data you gather and a list of every IP it ever connected to your site", and even this way does not imply that with only the IP you could know who the user is without even asking the telecom company for help. So, is it a Trojan horse ? Maybe, it heavily depend on how the EU want to do it. If they just ask "show me how you try to avoid that a minor access your material", which normally is the fist step, I don't see how it could be a Trojan horse. It could become, I agree on that. As you pointed out, it’s already illegal for them to access it, and parents are legally required to prevent their children from accessing it. No, parents are not legally required to prevent it. The seller (or provider) is legally required. It is a subtle but important difference. But you don’t lock down the entire population, or institute pre-crime surveillance policies, just because some parents are not going to follow the law. True. You simply impose laws that make mandatories for the provider to check if he can sell/serve something to someone. I mean asking that the cashier of mall check if I am an adult when I buy a bottle of wine is no different than asking to Pornhub to check if the viewer is an adult. I agree that in one case is really simple and in the other is really hard (and it is becoming harder by the day). You then charge the guilty parents after the offense. Ok, it would work, but then how do you caught the offendind parents if not checking what everyone do ? Is it not simpler to try to prevent it instead ?