Lots of fluff in this article and the site itself sucks. Here's the key paragraph: One way to achieve this would be to impose a levy on the gross revenues of the largest AI providers, collected by a national or multilateral agency. As the technology becomes increasingly embedded in daily life and production processes, the revenue flowing to AI firms is bound to grow – and so, too, will contributions to the fund. These resources could then be distributed by independent grant councils on multiyear cycles, ensuring that support reaches a wide range of disciplines and regions. My biggest issue with this approach is that it fails to acknowledge that AI is a bubble currently propped up by venture capital. In 1-4 years all those investors are going to want their ROI, and AI companies are going to start turning the money crank hard.

Imagine making an arena sport out of quicken loans

We need a c/okbuddyclanker

My money is on Kessler Syndrome in less than 20 years.

I trust my family. Trust them enough that they have the passcode to my phone and can easily open it at any time. But I'm not sharing location. How will I sneak out to buy gifts if they get a notification when I leave work? Nope.

Musk yes, but there are quite a few Ukrainian servicemen not happy, I think.

Impressively life threatening

Don't spend one more dollar on educational material. If a person had to pay for every textbook and online subscription, education would be impractical.