Skip to content

Spotify fans threaten to return to piracy as music streamer introduces new face-scanning age checks in the UK

Technology
413 248 0
  • ChatGPT Confessions gone? They are not !

    Technology technology
    3
    1
    61 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    ghostlypixel@lemmy.worldG
    I’m confused with this whole thing, isn’t there literally a check box to make it discoverable by search engines that the user has to opt in to? Was that not there before? [image: 05ZlUTeilZeqHkPuECH0ITq-6..v1753976931.png]
  • What's up with Kevin Kelly's '2049'?

    Technology technology
    3
    9 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    20 Aufrufe
    T
    Founding executive editor of Wired Magazine.
  • The challenge of deleting old online accounts | Loudwhisper

    Technology technology
    12
    59 Stimmen
    12 Beiträge
    63 Aufrufe
    L
    Thanks. Absolutely my experience too. The ones where you can't edit the email I noticed often used the email as username, and probably god knows how bad is the code on the backend.
  • Hitting the High Notes (2005)

    Technology technology
    2
    1
    12 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    32 Aufrufe
    T
    I always loved reading Joel's stuff, clear & well thought out. It was especially exciting when they were building Stack Overflow, but that's kinda got buried now. Things come & things go...
  • matrix is cooked

    Technology technology
    75
    1
    180 Stimmen
    75 Beiträge
    2k Aufrufe
    penguin202124@sh.itjust.worksP
    That's very fair. Better start contributing I guess.
  • Matrix.org is Introducing Premium Accounts

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    18 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • For All That Is Good About Humankind, Ban Smartphones

    Technology technology
    89
    1
    132 Stimmen
    89 Beiträge
    1k Aufrufe
    D
    Appreciated, but do you think the authorities want to win the war on drugs?
  • Why doesn't Nvidia have more competition?

    Technology technology
    22
    1
    33 Stimmen
    22 Beiträge
    232 Aufrufe
    B
    It’s funny how the article asks the question, but completely fails to answer it. About 15 years ago, Nvidia discovered there was a demand for compute in datacenters that could be met with powerful GPU’s, and they were quick to respond to it, and they had the resources to focus on it strongly, because of their huge success and high profitability in the GPU market. AMD also saw the market, and wanted to pursue it, but just over a decade ago where it began to clearly show the high potential for profitability, AMD was near bankrupt, and was very hard pressed to finance developments on GPU and compute in datacenters. AMD really tried the best they could, and was moderately successful from a technology perspective, but Nvidia already had a head start, and the proprietary development system CUDA was already an established standard that was very hard to penetrate. Intel simply fumbled the ball from start to finish. After a decade of trying to push ARM down from having the mobile crown by far, investing billions or actually the equivalent of ARM’s total revenue. They never managed to catch up to ARM despite they had the better production process at the time. This was the main focus of Intel, and Intel believed that GPU would never be more than a niche product. So when intel tried to compete on compute for datacenters, they tried to do it with X86 chips, One of their most bold efforts was to build a monstrosity of a cluster of Celeron chips, which of course performed laughably bad compared to Nvidia! Because as it turns out, the way forward at least for now, is indeed the massively parralel compute capability of a GPU, which Nvidia has refined for decades, only with (inferior) competition from AMD. But despite the lack of competition, Nvidia did not slow down, in fact with increased profits, they only grew bolder in their efforts. Making it even harder to catch up. Now AMD has had more money to compete for a while, and they do have some decent compute units, but Nvidia remains ahead and the CUDA problem is still there, so for AMD to really compete with Nvidia, they have to be better to attract customers. That’s a very tall order against Nvidia that simply seems to never stop progressing. So the only other option for AMD is to sell a bit cheaper. Which I suppose they have to. AMD and Intel were the obvious competitors, everybody else is coming from even further behind. But if I had to make a bet, it would be on Huawei. Huawei has some crazy good developers, and Trump is basically forcing them to figure it out themselves, because he is blocking Huawei and China in general from using both AMD and Nvidia AI chips. And the chips will probably be made by Chinese SMIC, because they are also prevented from using advanced production in the west, most notably TSMC. China will prevail, because it’s become a national project, of both prestige and necessity, and they have a massive talent mass and resources, so nothing can stop it now. IMO USA would clearly have been better off allowing China to use American chips. Now China will soon compete directly on both production and design too.