U.S. government takes 10% stake in Intel, as Trump expands control over private sector
-
This post did not contain any content.
U.S. government takes 10% stake in Intel, as Trump expands control over private sector
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said that the U.S. government has taken a 10% stake in chipmaker Intel.
CNBC (www.cnbc.com)
-
This post did not contain any content.
U.S. government takes 10% stake in Intel, as Trump expands control over private sector
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said that the U.S. government has taken a 10% stake in chipmaker Intel.
CNBC (www.cnbc.com)
Funny, when Europe does this, it’s called “socialism”.
-
Funny, when Europe does this, it’s called “socialism”.
And when China and Arab states do it, it's something to aspire.
-
This post did not contain any content.
U.S. government takes 10% stake in Intel, as Trump expands control over private sector
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said that the U.S. government has taken a 10% stake in chipmaker Intel.
CNBC (www.cnbc.com)
small penis government
-
Funny, when Europe does this, it’s called “socialism”.
Can you imagine the screams of, “COMMUNISM!!!!” If Obama or Biden had done this. It’s all we would hear about for an entire election cycle. Fox “News” would play it nonstop.
-
This post did not contain any content.
U.S. government takes 10% stake in Intel, as Trump expands control over private sector
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said that the U.S. government has taken a 10% stake in chipmaker Intel.
CNBC (www.cnbc.com)
And so the current Intel chipset I have will be the last I ever own.
-
This post did not contain any content.
U.S. government takes 10% stake in Intel, as Trump expands control over private sector
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said that the U.S. government has taken a 10% stake in chipmaker Intel.
CNBC (www.cnbc.com)
AyyyyyyyyMD
-
Can you imagine the screams of, “COMMUNISM!!!!” If Obama or Biden had done this. It’s all we would hear about for an entire election cycle. Fox “News” would play it nonstop.
Didn't Obama do it for GM and a bunch of other companies as part of a bailout package for a period of time?
-
Didn't Obama do it for GM and a bunch of other companies as part of a bailout package for a period of time?
Ah but a bailout package is different. That's a display of powerful capitalism. A private company so powerful it can't be allowed to fail and a government so strong it won't allow it to fail.
-
This post did not contain any content.
U.S. government takes 10% stake in Intel, as Trump expands control over private sector
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said that the U.S. government has taken a 10% stake in chipmaker Intel.
CNBC (www.cnbc.com)
Uhhh, so much for the free market Republicans spent decades championing
-
Didn't Obama do it for GM and a bunch of other companies as part of a bailout package for a period of time?
So did Bush. It's only bad when their enemies do it. It's righteous and just when they do it.
-
Uhhh, so much for the free market Republicans spent decades championing
They’ll run it into the ground regardless.
-
This post did not contain any content.
U.S. government takes 10% stake in Intel, as Trump expands control over private sector
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said that the U.S. government has taken a 10% stake in chipmaker Intel.
CNBC (www.cnbc.com)
I personally don't think any of these big companies should be privately owned. Rare win for the pedo admin. Maybe we can get 10% of the epstein files next.
-
They’ll run it into the ground regardless.
Well, yeah, they always do. Republican admins always leave the economy in the shitter and saddle the nation up with debt so that the incoming Democratic admin has to spend all of their time bringing the economy back up to speed rather than implementing effective reform.
-
This post did not contain any content.
U.S. government takes 10% stake in Intel, as Trump expands control over private sector
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said that the U.S. government has taken a 10% stake in chipmaker Intel.
CNBC (www.cnbc.com)
Imagine bribing politicians to get tax breaks as those same politicians start to take more of a cut than the other side would have taxed you. I'm starting to think everyone that is rich and powerful are also incredibly stupid.
-
This post did not contain any content.
U.S. government takes 10% stake in Intel, as Trump expands control over private sector
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said that the U.S. government has taken a 10% stake in chipmaker Intel.
CNBC (www.cnbc.com)
Seems like the government owning private industry might stray into the socialism thing thy hate. Why not do this with something more important like healthcare? Republicans are hypocrites.
-
Didn't Obama do it for GM and a bunch of other companies as part of a bailout package for a period of time?
It was Bush just before he left office.
-
This post did not contain any content.
U.S. government takes 10% stake in Intel, as Trump expands control over private sector
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said that the U.S. government has taken a 10% stake in chipmaker Intel.
CNBC (www.cnbc.com)
If tax payers are going to be investing into these businesses and they're avoiding taxes taking a share of the company is better than nothing.
I mean, it's socialism, but don't tell their voters
-
And so the current Intel chipset I have will be the last I ever own.
I feel like that should’ve already been a given when the 13th and 14th gen Core processors permanently kneecap themselves if they feel like it. But that’s just me.
-
So if I'm reading that right they set for $700 billion worth of purchase during the Bush admin, it got reduced to 426.4 billion by 2014 and they claimed they made $15.3 billion. It sounds like they made a 3.5% gain on their investment total. A win! Yay... Only if you ignore the fact that if that money went in from 2009-2024, the money averages out on inflation to have been worth 481.29 billion. A loss of $12.15 billion dollars if they would have done anything else with it.
Overall I wouldn't be mad that they wasted that money if they had focused on structuring the company moving forward in a manner that wouldn't end up supporting a wealth divide moving forward. The CEO "only" had a salary of $2.1 million in 2024. Which actually sounds mildly alright. Yet her take home was $29.5 million when they got done throwing stocks and bonuses at her. That's after GM stock started 2024 at $55.50.... and ended the year at $35.64.
So the company lost ~36% of its "worth" and she got more than 13x her salary in stock and bonuses.