95% of Companies See ‘Zero Return’ on $30 Billion Generative AI Spend, MIT Report Finds
Technology
72
Beiträge
61
Kommentatoren
1
Aufrufe
-
This post did not contain any content.
So I'll be getting job interviews soon? Right?
-
This post did not contain any content.
The first problem is the name. It's NOT artificial intelligence, it's artificial stupidity.
People BOUGHT intelligence but GOT stupidity.
-
This post did not contain any content.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Imagine how much more they could've just paid employees.
-
The first problem is the name. It's NOT artificial intelligence, it's artificial stupidity.
People BOUGHT intelligence but GOT stupidity.
It's a search engine with a natural language interface.
-
The first problem is the name. It's NOT artificial intelligence, it's artificial stupidity.
People BOUGHT intelligence but GOT stupidity.
Artificial Imbecility
-
This post did not contain any content.
Could've told them that for $1B.
-
This post did not contain any content.
I have no proof, but I feel like the AI push and Turnip getting re-elected and his regression of the EPA rules sounds like this whole AI thing was an excuse to burn more fossil fuels.
If I was invested in AI, and considering AI's thirst for electricity, I would absolutely make a similar investment in energy. That way, as the AI server farms suck up the electricity I would get at least some of that money back from the energy market.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Wonder if the 5% that actually made money included companies that sell enterprise AI services, like AWS, Microsoft, and Google?
-
It's a search engine with a natural language interface.
An unreliable search engine that lies
-
This post did not contain any content.
We're now at the "if you don't, your competitor will". So you really have no choice. There are people that don't use Google anymore and just use chatgpt for all questions.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Douse it with gasoline. Burn it with fire.
-
An unreliable search engine that lies
It obfuctates its sources, so you don't know if the answer to your question is coming from a relevant expert, or the dankest corners of reddit...it all sounds the same after it's been processed by a hundred billion GPUs!
-
So I'll be getting job interviews soon? Right?
"Well, we could hire humans...but they tell us the next update will fix everything! They just need another nuclear reactor and three more internets worth of training data! We're almost there!"
-
This post did not contain any content.
STOP CALCULATING KEEP SHOVELING
-
Could've told them that for $1B.
Heck, I'da done it for just 1% of that.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Does anybody have the original study? I tried to find it but the link is dead ( looks like NANDA pulled it )
-
Imagine how much more they could've just paid employees.
Nah. Profits are growing, but not as fast as they used to. Need more layoffs and cut salaries. That’ll make things really efficient.
Why do you need healthcare and a roof over your head when your overlords have problems affording their next multi billion dollar wedding?
-
Nah. Profits are growing, but not as fast as they used to. Need more layoffs and cut salaries. That’ll make things really efficient.
Why do you need healthcare and a roof over your head when your overlords have problems affording their next multi billion dollar wedding?
Someone somewhere is inventing a technology that will save thirty minutes on the production of my wares and when that day comes I will tower above my competitors as I exchange my products for a fraction less than theirs. They will tremble at my more efficient process as they stand unable to compete!
-
It's as if it's a bubble or something...
And the next deepseek is coming out soon
