Why It's OK to Block Ads (2015)
-
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.bestiver.se/post/560483
no ads in web 1.0 and the internet was perfectly fine
-
no ads in web 1.0 and the internet was perfectly fine
There were ads! But these were simple banner graphics of 468x60 pixels. In the worst case it was an animated GIF. But hosted on the same server as the page and without any tracking shenanigans.
-
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.bestiver.se/post/560483
Because even US secret services (multiple of them) say so.
-
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.bestiver.se/post/560483
Isn’t ad blocking, as the industry magazine AdAge has called it, “robbery, plain and simple”?
Robbing corporations is based, though, actually.
-
no ads in web 1.0 and the internet was perfectly fine
there were so many fucking ads online in the late 90s
and you couldn't block them because they were either served from the same domain or used the same plugin as the content and it was an all-or-nothing thing
all those goddamn blinking gifs with "click here" and "you're our millionth visitor", and the pop-ups, and the flash bars with "shoot the ducks"...
-
there were so many fucking ads online in the late 90s
and you couldn't block them because they were either served from the same domain or used the same plugin as the content and it was an all-or-nothing thing
all those goddamn blinking gifs with "click here" and "you're our millionth visitor", and the pop-ups, and the flash bars with "shoot the ducks"...
a lot of those came up in the late 90s early 2000s though. the early 90s were mostly just text based pages.
-
a lot of those came up in the late 90s early 2000s though. the early 90s were mostly just text based pages.
yeah, but as soon as the web actually had enough traffic to take off the ads were everywhere. before 1996 it was basically just a prototype.
-
There were ads! But these were simple banner graphics of 468x60 pixels. In the worst case it was an animated GIF. But hosted on the same server as the page and without any tracking shenanigans.
I remember the add that made me install my first add blocker. It stated playing the sound of knocking on glass and a voice going "Hey You!". With a looped videoof some guy waving at me.
Every so often one gets through my blocker and they have only gotten more annoying.
-
I remember the add that made me install my first add blocker. It stated playing the sound of knocking on glass and a voice going "Hey You!". With a looped videoof some guy waving at me.
Every so often one gets through my blocker and they have only gotten more annoying.
Yeah, people seem to have mostly forgotten about the forced audio playback that was really prevalent for a while. It was crazy effective because you would have to hint down the actual ad causing the issue on the page to stop it.
-
no ads in web 1.0 and the internet was perfectly fine
You know, it's pretty easy to tell you weren't old enough to see the original Internet when you say something like that, because this was what it was like:
-
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.bestiver.se/post/560483
They’re unnecessary, distracting, some try to track you and others can have malware. No thanks.
-
It's my network. I control what does or does not go through it.
It has never even occurred to me that it might not be okay to block ads on connections or devices that I own -- or even those that I don't, for that matter.
-
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.bestiver.se/post/560483
Here's why it's okay to block ads in pretty simple terms:
Ads can contain ransomware; that is to say, a seemingly innocent ad can deliver a payload which will run on your computer, lock your files, and demand you pay hundreds or even thousands of dollars anonymously.
Now if you go to the website that served the ad and tell them, "I allowed ads on your site because I support your right to monetise your content, and now I have to pay hundreds or thousands of dollars, will you help me pay that" or "will you pay that for me since your site served the ransomware," you know what they will tell you, every single time, without fail? Whether they actually answer you, or more likely, just delete your email. They're telling you that it's your problem. That you should have secured your computer better.
So secure your computer better now. Block all the ads.
Getting a little more technical, use Firefox or a fork of it. Use Linux if you can. Use a Mac if you can't. If you really must use Windows, know how to secure it. I use Windows 11 at work, I'd never use it at home, but I had a talk with the IT guy, and he let me do a few things to it. I know more than he does, but he's the one with the job, so I told him what I'd do before I did it, I did exactly what I said I was going to do, nothing more nothing less, and I still think my home computer is more secure, but I'm a lot less worried about using the work machine. I think it's wild that so many companies just use Windows. I'm not trying to hate on Windows. It's good for gaming and it's accessible. I'd love to see more companies roll their own *nix or just use Macs (which run macOS which is UNIX certified).
-
Hmm, I was fully expecting Ron Swanson there.
-
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.bestiver.se/post/560483
Advertising should be illegal. It should be considered harassment.
If you want people to find your product then we need to log that in a public database site. If you want to find a product go there, nobody ever wants to find a product while driving or watching movies or existing in public.
-
no ads in web 1.0 and the internet was perfectly fine
That's before it got colonized by megacorporations.
-
They’re unnecessary, distracting, some try to track you and others can have malware. No thanks.
"some". more like 99.9999999% of them
-
Hmm, I was fully expecting Ron Swanson there.
Just because I like that gif too:
-
Advertising should be illegal. It should be considered harassment.
If you want people to find your product then we need to log that in a public database site. If you want to find a product go there, nobody ever wants to find a product while driving or watching movies or existing in public.
I agree, it's just a net negative for the world.
If nobody advertised, the world would be better off
-
Here's why it's okay to block ads in pretty simple terms:
Ads can contain ransomware; that is to say, a seemingly innocent ad can deliver a payload which will run on your computer, lock your files, and demand you pay hundreds or even thousands of dollars anonymously.
Now if you go to the website that served the ad and tell them, "I allowed ads on your site because I support your right to monetise your content, and now I have to pay hundreds or thousands of dollars, will you help me pay that" or "will you pay that for me since your site served the ransomware," you know what they will tell you, every single time, without fail? Whether they actually answer you, or more likely, just delete your email. They're telling you that it's your problem. That you should have secured your computer better.
So secure your computer better now. Block all the ads.
Getting a little more technical, use Firefox or a fork of it. Use Linux if you can. Use a Mac if you can't. If you really must use Windows, know how to secure it. I use Windows 11 at work, I'd never use it at home, but I had a talk with the IT guy, and he let me do a few things to it. I know more than he does, but he's the one with the job, so I told him what I'd do before I did it, I did exactly what I said I was going to do, nothing more nothing less, and I still think my home computer is more secure, but I'm a lot less worried about using the work machine. I think it's wild that so many companies just use Windows. I'm not trying to hate on Windows. It's good for gaming and it's accessible. I'd love to see more companies roll their own *nix or just use Macs (which run macOS which is UNIX certified).
Here's why it's okay to block ads in even simpler terms: It's my fucking computer.