If you mean a USB-C port in general, they can be made waterproof. If you mean something specific to putting one in the most compact form factor possible, that might be true.

You kind of are, it's basically the same magnets+wireless combo Apple uses for their phones.

I don't know if you could use the same charger for a phone. Probably not. But it's a cross-company standard, so the idea would be to do the same for watches, if the standard doesn't include a watch option already (I haven't looked into it, frankly).

Don't watches use pads to recharge with a usbc? My samsung did.

Pebble is coming back.

We're bringing Pebble back!

Eight years later, you still can't beat a Pebble

(repebble.com)

It would be a dream! And I imagine easier to repair as USB anything involves pushing and pulling a physical connector that will eventually break. It may take a long time, but anything that moves will eventually break.

yeah I saw that....might take a closer look after its out and reviewed.
ATM my forever watch (and old CASIO) is still going strong. It outlived the pebble haha.

Clearly we need MicroUSB-C /s

A usb-c port would be a large percentage of the volume of your standard wearable. Percentage that could be used for battery

Most wearable chargers are a few flat contacts or a tiny qi charger coil

Because the port and the associated internal hardware would take up a huge amount of space.

It's not much space to a smartphone, but to a device the size of a watch, the USB-C port would end up being the largest internal component.

Wireless charging is the answer for most watches, though it means cases can't be all metal and glass.

And yet, I literally have one on my wrist now. It's not noticeably bigger than the Pixel 3 watch.

Here's a video of it in action - https://tube.tchncs.de/w/vYTnG6eKghnicdNj5nkhVx

I wrote the post above. So far, the USB-C watch has lasted over 3 days and still has over 50% battery power.

Obviously, at that price it isn't running a cellular radio or GPS. BLE is amazingly efficient - as are the built in sensors.

My spoon USB-C port is too big

eta: JFC, who wrote this?

Here is a modern smartwatch with USB C

Picture of a fucking brick with straps

Seriously, none of those "examples" are anything I would consider wearing, and I have clubs for hands

Galaxy watch is not technically Qi but WPC compatible and I've ised a number of qi chargers that have worked with it. Also charges directly off my phone via power share.
I would prefer cramming more battery into the thing rather than cramming a USB port into it.

This is confirmation bias, you know it’s possible so you’re discounting downsides.

Yes, a connector can fit in the watch, but the internal footprint of the connector is comparatively huge. All the other components of the watch would need to be designed to fit around a large connector essentially directly in the middle of the device internals.

If that’s really important to you, more power to you. I don’t have an issue with it existing. I do have a bit of a problem with pretending that compromises aren’t being made in features to accommodate it.

A standardized magnetic pogo pin connector would meet my needs quite a bit better, personally.

I have a Garmin watch. Lasts 2+ weeks on a charge depending on how I use it.

I have an almost new pebble time steel in a box on a shelf. When they did the Kickstarter and then basically shut down right after I couldn't bring myself to part with it. It's probably worth a few bucks.

oh quit that bs. There was waterproof (not resistant) micro usb more than a literal decade ago. If anything they should have gottn better.

My OG pebble lives on, albeit with a 3 day battery life. I've preordered the new one and hope that it'll last even longer

Nice, let us know how that goes!!

Ive heard it works with solar too? Does it stop working after a certain timeperiod of just go into low power mode until it gets enough sun?