Skip to content

Are a few people ruining the internet for the rest of us?

Technology
25 21 454
  • 0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 355 Stimmen
    20 Beiträge
    14 Aufrufe
    S
    They still would, it just wouldn’t have their name on it.
  • 966 Stimmen
    359 Beiträge
    9k Aufrufe
    I
    Because they've always railed against the nanny state. Kemi is a dreadful populist. It isn't popular. You're simply making excuses for Keir and anyone that disagrees doesn't understand. Copium.
  • How we Rooted Copilot

    Technology technology
    15
    1
    155 Stimmen
    15 Beiträge
    73 Aufrufe
    ?
    Surely there wasn't an exploit on the half a year out of date kernel (Article screenshots from April 2025, uname kernel release from a CBL-Mariner released September 3rd 2024).
  • Pornhub is Back in France.

    Technology technology
    33
    1
    311 Stimmen
    33 Beiträge
    294 Aufrufe
    D
    Nordé VPN
  • Resurrecting a dead torrent tracker and finding 3 million peers

    Technology technology
    59
    321 Stimmen
    59 Beiträge
    531 Aufrufe
    I
    Yeah i suppose any form of payment that you have to keep secret for some reason is a reason to use crypto, though I struggle to imagine needing that if you're not doing something dodgy imagine you’re a YouTuber and want to accept donations: that will force you to give out your name to them, which they could use to get your address and phone number. There’s always someone that hates you, and I rather not have them knowing my personal info Wat. Crypto is not good at solving that, it's in fact much much worse than traditional payment methods. There's a reason scammers always want to be paid in crypto if you’re the seller then it’s a lot better. With the traditional banking system, with enough knowledge you can cheat both sides: stolen cards, abusive chargebacks, bank accounts in other countries under fake name/fake ID… Crypto simplifies scamming when the seller, and pretty much makes it impossible for buyers What specifically are you boycotting? Card payments, international tranfers, national transfers taking days to complete, money being seizable at all times many banks lose money on them Their plans are basically all focused on the card you get. Pretty sure they make money with it, else many wouldn’t offer cash back (selling infos and getting a fee from card payments?) if you think the people that benefit from you using crypto (crypto exchange owners and billionaires that own crypto etc.) are less evil than goverment regulated banks, you're deluded. Banks are evil anyways, does it really change anything? The difference is that it technically helps everyone using crypto, not only the rich. Plus P2P exchanges are a thing You'll spend more money using crypto for that, not less That’s just factually false. Do you know the price of a swift transfer? Now compare it to crypto tx fees, with many being under $0.01
  • 4 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    17 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 48 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    56 Aufrufe
    L
    Arguably we should be imposing 25% DST on digital products to counter the 25% tariff on aluminium and steel and then 10% on everything else. The US started it by imposing blanket tariffs in spite of our free trade agreement.