Skip to content

ICEBlock climbs to the top of the App Store charts after officials slam it

Technology
94 56 0
  • Rediscovering Human Purpose in the Age of AI

    Technology technology
    2
    1
    3 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    12 Aufrufe
    capuccino@lemmy.worldC
    well, it seems that the rich will stay rich, no matter what. It's incredible that people see AI as a religion now
  • New "subguides" on my guide to Pocket alternatives

    Technology technology
    1
    5 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    7 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 112 Stimmen
    23 Beiträge
    46 Aufrufe
    exec@pawb.socialE
    I mean no more live view via the screen
  • Album 'Hysteria' Out Now

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    1 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    2 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 311 Stimmen
    37 Beiträge
    20 Aufrufe
    S
    Same, especially when searching technical or niche topics. Since there aren't a ton of results specific to the topic, mostly semi-related results will appear in the first page or two of a regular (non-Gemini) Google search, just due to the higher popularity of those webpages compared to the relevant webpages. Even the relevant webpages will have lots of non-relevant or semi-relevant information surrounding the answer I'm looking for. I don't know enough about it to be sure, but Gemini is probably just scraping a handful of websites on the first page, and since most of those are only semi-related, the resulting summary is a classic example of garbage in, garbage out. I also think there's probably something in the code that looks for information that is shared across multiple sources and prioritizing that over something that's only on one particular page (possibly the sole result with the information you need). Then, it phrases the summary as a direct answer to your query, misrepresenting the actual information on the pages they scraped. At least Gemini gives sources, I guess. The thing that gets on my nerves the most is how often I see people quote the summary as proof of something without checking the sources. It was bad before the rollout of Gemini, but at least back then Google was mostly scraping text and presenting it with little modification, along with a direct link to the webpage. Now, it's an LLM generating text phrased as a direct answer to a question (that was also AI-generated from your search query) using AI-summarized data points scraped from multiple webpages. It's obfuscating the source material further, but I also can't help but feel like it exposes a little of the behind-the-scenes fuckery Google has been doing for years before Gemini. How it bastardizes your query by interpreting it into a question, and then prioritizes homogeneous results that agree on the "answer" to your "question". For years they've been doing this to a certain extent, they just didn't share how they interpreted your query.
  • Why Silicon Valley Needs Immigration

    Technology technology
    4
    1
    36 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    14 Aufrufe
    anarch157a@lemmy.dbzer0.comA
    "Because theyŕe greedy fucks". There, saved you a click.
  • 18 Stimmen
    18 Beiträge
    16 Aufrufe
    freebooter69@lemmy.caF
    The US courts gave corporations person-hood, AI just around the corner.
  • 3 Stimmen
    19 Beiträge
    18 Aufrufe
    M
    Are most people in "the west" worse off today than they were 150 years ago? Are there fewer well functioning democracies than there were then? Has no minority group seen any improvement in their freedom? Has there been no improvement in how people interact with each other? No improvement in poverty?