Skip to content

Google hit with $314m fine for collecting data from idle Android phones without permission

Technology
53 44 0
  • YouTube Comment Bots are out of control...

    Technology technology
    3
    52 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    3 Aufrufe
    D
    Youtube is just lazy. These bots are laughably easy to detect and block.
  • Google kills the fact-checking snippet

    Technology technology
    13
    149 Stimmen
    13 Beiträge
    10 Aufrufe
    L
    Remember when that useless bot was around here, objectively wrong, and getting downvoted all the time? Good times.
  • 18 Stimmen
    9 Beiträge
    5 Aufrufe
    brewchin@lemmy.worldB
    Inevitable, really. And zero surprise it's coming out of China.
  • Resurrecting a dead torrent tracker and finding 3 million peers

    Technology technology
    58
    321 Stimmen
    58 Beiträge
    55 Aufrufe
    M
    donating online Yeah i suppose any form of payment that you have to keep secret for some reason is a reason to use crypto, though I struggle to imagine needing that if you're not doing something dodgy avoiding scams for p2p transactions Wat. Crypto is not good at solving that, it's in fact much much worse than traditional payment methods. There's a reason scammers always want to be paid in crypto boycotting the banking system What specifically are you boycotting? The money that backs your crypto (i.e. that you bought it with) still sits in a bank account somewhere and continues to support the banks. All you're boycotting then are payments, but those are usually free for consumers (many banks lose money on them) so you're not exactly "sticking it to the man" by not using them. Evem if you were somehow hurting banks by using crypto, if you think the people that benefit from you using crypto (crypto exchange owners and billionaires that own crypto etc.) are less evil than goverment regulated banks, you're deluded. What about avoiding international payment fees? You'll spend more money using crypto for that, not less
  • Is Matrix cooked?

    Technology technology
    54
    100 Stimmen
    54 Beiträge
    21 Aufrufe
    W
    Didn't know it only applied to UWP apps on Windows. That does seem like a pretty big problem then. it is mostly for compatibility reasons. no win32 programs are equipped to handle such granular permissions and sandboxing, they are all made with the assumption that they have access to whatever they need (other than other users' resources and things that require elevation). if Microsoft would have made that limitation to every kind of software, that Windows version would have probably been a failure in popularity because lots of software would have broken. I think S editions of windows is how they tried to go in that direction, with a more drastic way of simply just dropping support for 3rd party win32 programs. I don't still have a Mac readily available to test with but afaik it is any application that uses Apple's packaging format. ok, so if you run linux or windows utils in a compatibility layer, they still have less of a limited access? by which I mean graphical utilities. just tried with firefox, for macos it wanted to give me an .iso file (???) if so, it seems apple is doing roughly the same as microsoft with uwp and the appx format, and linux with flatpak: it's a choice for the user
  • 136 Stimmen
    16 Beiträge
    23 Aufrufe
    E
    I thought we were going to get our share of the damages
  • AI could already be conscious. Are we ready for it?

    Technology technology
    64
    1
    16 Stimmen
    64 Beiträge
    22 Aufrufe
    A
    AI isn't math formulas though. AI is a complex dynamic system reacting to external input. There is no fundamental difference here to a human brain in that regard imo. It's just that the processing isn't happening in biological tissue but in silicon. Is it way less complex than a human? Sure. Is there a fundamental qualitative difference? I don't think so. What's the qualitative difference in your opinion?
  • 0 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    14 Aufrufe
    J
    I deleted the snapchat now.