Jury says Google must pay California Android smartphone users $314.6m
Technology
14
Beiträge
12
Kommentatoren
0
Aufrufe
-
This post did not contain any content.
Jury says Google must pay California Android smartphone users $314.6m
Alphabet’s company found liable for making data transfers without permission while devices were idle
the Guardian (www.theguardian.com)
-
This post did not contain any content.
Jury says Google must pay California Android smartphone users $314.6m
Alphabet’s company found liable for making data transfers without permission while devices were idle
the Guardian (www.theguardian.com)
Can't wait to get my fifty-two cents!
-
This post did not contain any content.
Jury says Google must pay California Android smartphone users $314.6m
Alphabet’s company found liable for making data transfers without permission while devices were idle
the Guardian (www.theguardian.com)
Must be nice to be one of those lawyers
-
This post did not contain any content.
Jury says Google must pay California Android smartphone users $314.6m
Alphabet’s company found liable for making data transfers without permission while devices were idle
the Guardian (www.theguardian.com)
Google: "Meh. Cost of doing business. We're certainly not going to stop or anything...."
-
Can't wait to get my fifty-two cents!
Even if it were split evenly across the estimated 14m residents, it only comes to a grand total of $22.47
-
Even if it were split evenly across the estimated 14m residents, it only comes to a grand total of $22.47
After correcting for how many of those are cellphone users, then correcting for how many of those are android users, then correcting for how many of those are the plan owners, it would be considerably more.
....until you correct for the lawyers fee, then it goes back to $22.47
-
This post did not contain any content.
Jury says Google must pay California Android smartphone users $314.6m
Alphabet’s company found liable for making data transfers without permission while devices were idle
the Guardian (www.theguardian.com)
In the Netherlands there is also a class-action lawsuit coming up, guess there is roughly the same amount of android users here. Maybe a bit more. Will be interesting to see how much lower that amount will be.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Jury says Google must pay California Android smartphone users $314.6m
Alphabet’s company found liable for making data transfers without permission while devices were idle
the Guardian (www.theguardian.com)
california android. was that before or after ice cream sandwich?
-
After correcting for how many of those are cellphone users, then correcting for how many of those are android users, then correcting for how many of those are the plan owners, it would be considerably more.
....until you correct for the lawyers fee, then it goes back to $22.47
Lawyers own the best middleman injection strategy in history.
-
After correcting for how many of those are cellphone users, then correcting for how many of those are android users, then correcting for how many of those are the plan owners, it would be considerably more.
....until you correct for the lawyers fee, then it goes back to $22.47
I probably should have clarified that the 14m number was the estimated number of Californian residents that have Android phones as per the article, but my comment was moreso me overanalysing a joke.
-
I probably should have clarified that the 14m number was the estimated number of Californian residents that have Android phones as per the article, but my comment was moreso me overanalysing a joke.
Ah, my mistake
-
california android. was that before or after ice cream sandwich?
Those food based subversion names are all alphabetical. I guess back then they didn't have enough avocados in the code to call it "California style" so they went with "Cupcake."
-
Even if it were split evenly across the estimated 14m residents, it only comes to a grand total of $22.47
Eh, half of them are probably iPhone users. I'm boutta be a $40aire baby!
-
After correcting for how many of those are cellphone users, then correcting for how many of those are android users, then correcting for how many of those are the plan owners, it would be considerably more.
....until you correct for the lawyers fee, then it goes back to $22.47
According to the case website, it looks like it's only people who own a device made by Google that runs their voice assistant. So, Samsung Android users are not included, but anyone with a Google Home device or a Chromecast is included
-
-
-
Senators Call for The FTC to Launch an Investigation into Spotify for Forcing Subscribers into Higher-Priced Subscriptions Without Their Consent.
Technology
1
-
-
-
-
Twenty-seven states and DC sue 23andMe to oppose the sale of DNA data from its customers without their direct consent
Technology
1
-
Nvidia debuts a native GeForce NOW app for Steam Deck, supporting games in up to 4K at 60 FPS; in testing, the app extended Steam Deck battery life by up to 50%
Technology
1
