Skip to content

PSA: Stop Using These Fire-Prone Anker Power Banks Right Now

Technology
44 32 0
  • The Wikipedia Test

    Technology technology
    8
    1
    85 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    B
    You act like they want us to have access to information they don't have full control over. I'm pretty sure that's a really low priority for most of them.
  • 361 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    3 Aufrufe
    A
    No I don't think there really were many so your point is valid But the law works like that, things are in a grey area or in limbo until they are defined into law. That means the new law can be written to either protect consumer privacy, or make it legal to the letter to rape consumer privacy like this bill, or some weird inbetween where some shady stuff is still explicitly allowed but in general consumers are protected in specific ways from specific privacy abuses This bill being the second option is bad because typically when laws are written it then takes a loooong time to reverse them
  • How could AI escape human control?

    Technology technology
    5
    6 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    10 Aufrufe
    Z
    Don't mix up country bosses with technology bosses - even if they have the same brain damages.
  • 33 Stimmen
    13 Beiträge
    15 Aufrufe
    maggiwuerze@feddit.orgM
    2x Fn on MacBooks
  • Was ist ChatGPT?

    Technology technology
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    9 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 92 Stimmen
    42 Beiträge
    14 Aufrufe
    G
    You don’t understand. The tracking and spying is the entire point of the maneuver. The ‘children are accessing porn’ thing is just a Trojan horse to justify the spying. I understand what are you saying, I simply don't consider to check if a law is applied as a Trojan horse in itself. I would agree if the EU had said to these sites "give us all the the access log, a list of your subscriber, every data you gather and a list of every IP it ever connected to your site", and even this way does not imply that with only the IP you could know who the user is without even asking the telecom company for help. So, is it a Trojan horse ? Maybe, it heavily depend on how the EU want to do it. If they just ask "show me how you try to avoid that a minor access your material", which normally is the fist step, I don't see how it could be a Trojan horse. It could become, I agree on that. As you pointed out, it’s already illegal for them to access it, and parents are legally required to prevent their children from accessing it. No, parents are not legally required to prevent it. The seller (or provider) is legally required. It is a subtle but important difference. But you don’t lock down the entire population, or institute pre-crime surveillance policies, just because some parents are not going to follow the law. True. You simply impose laws that make mandatories for the provider to check if he can sell/serve something to someone. I mean asking that the cashier of mall check if I am an adult when I buy a bottle of wine is no different than asking to Pornhub to check if the viewer is an adult. I agree that in one case is really simple and in the other is really hard (and it is becoming harder by the day). You then charge the guilty parents after the offense. Ok, it would work, but then how do you caught the offendind parents if not checking what everyone do ? Is it not simpler to try to prevent it instead ?
  • 168 Stimmen
    11 Beiträge
    13 Aufrufe
    A
    Law enforcement officer
  • *deleted by creator*

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    8 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet