Skip to content

Judge backs AI firm over use of copyrighted books

Technology
59 34 674
  • 289 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    17 Aufrufe
    ulrich@feddit.orgU
    As much as it may feel like it, Trump hasn't been President for the last 10 years.
  • Strength Reimagined: Rigid Exoskeleton Market Advancements

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    1 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    10 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 50 Stimmen
    6 Beiträge
    42 Aufrufe
    H
    He's also being aggressive against countries who would like to tax the extortionist profits made by those companies from their people. "AI Action Plan" is focused on keeping world extorted by US tech giants without any foreign taxes on that extortion. World seems to be sucking up to it. Democrats will not revoke new slavery status of colonies.
  • 44 Stimmen
    10 Beiträge
    72 Aufrufe
    muusemuuse@sh.itjust.worksM
    Hospitals would likely be fine with it. The health insurance industry would not though and would pressure the hospital to cut you off. It’s illegal. But they would do it anyway. You would need serious fuck you money to change this. And even then, probably a lot of Luigis too.
  • Dubai to debut restaurant operated by an AI chef

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    1 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    23 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • I build a YouTube to Transcript online tool

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    24 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Do you remember Windows 95? How about Windows 96?

    Technology technology
    32
    76 Stimmen
    32 Beiträge
    446 Aufrufe
    M
    Ha, thanks for searching!
  • 92 Stimmen
    42 Beiträge
    403 Aufrufe
    G
    You don’t understand. The tracking and spying is the entire point of the maneuver. The ‘children are accessing porn’ thing is just a Trojan horse to justify the spying. I understand what are you saying, I simply don't consider to check if a law is applied as a Trojan horse in itself. I would agree if the EU had said to these sites "give us all the the access log, a list of your subscriber, every data you gather and a list of every IP it ever connected to your site", and even this way does not imply that with only the IP you could know who the user is without even asking the telecom company for help. So, is it a Trojan horse ? Maybe, it heavily depend on how the EU want to do it. If they just ask "show me how you try to avoid that a minor access your material", which normally is the fist step, I don't see how it could be a Trojan horse. It could become, I agree on that. As you pointed out, it’s already illegal for them to access it, and parents are legally required to prevent their children from accessing it. No, parents are not legally required to prevent it. The seller (or provider) is legally required. It is a subtle but important difference. But you don’t lock down the entire population, or institute pre-crime surveillance policies, just because some parents are not going to follow the law. True. You simply impose laws that make mandatories for the provider to check if he can sell/serve something to someone. I mean asking that the cashier of mall check if I am an adult when I buy a bottle of wine is no different than asking to Pornhub to check if the viewer is an adult. I agree that in one case is really simple and in the other is really hard (and it is becoming harder by the day). You then charge the guilty parents after the offense. Ok, it would work, but then how do you caught the offendind parents if not checking what everyone do ? Is it not simpler to try to prevent it instead ?