Skip to content

Apple sued by shareholders for allegedly overstating AI progress

Technology
75 49 384
  • What are the most in-demand Tech Skills? (besides AI)

    Technology technology
    5
    10 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    jordanlund@lemmy.worldJ
    AI is devaluing other skills. I got an email today, from my own company, telling me I wouldn't have to renew my professional certification for 2 years if I passed an unrelated test on AI. The "test" was 10 questions. Glad to know my professional certification is equivalent to a 10 question pop quiz on AI.
  • Video game actors' strike officially ends after AI deal

    Technology technology
    11
    1
    119 Stimmen
    11 Beiträge
    45 Aufrufe
    paraphrand@lemmy.worldP
    huh, interesting! It’s The Mythical Man-Month! That book was published back in 1975. They definitely know better, but must be in quite a pickle.
  • The effects of AI on firms and workers

    Technology technology
    4
    1
    12 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    32 Aufrufe
    brobot9000@lemmy.worldB
    Your response is: want to be more productive? Replace the CEO and pointless middle management with Ai! Image how much money the shareholders would save!
  • www2025

    Technology technology
    1
    2
    1 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    13 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 151 Stimmen
    23 Beiträge
    130 Aufrufe
    D
    I played around the launch and didn't realize there were bots (outside of pve)... But I also assumed I was shooting a bunch of kids that barely understood the controls.
  • 462 Stimmen
    94 Beiträge
    358 Aufrufe
    L
    Make them publishers or whatever is required to have it be a legal requirement, have them ban people who share false information. The law doesn't magically make open discussions not open. By design, social media is open. If discussion from the public is closed, then it's no longer social media. ban people who share false information Banning people doesn't stop falsehoods. It's a broken solution promoting a false assurance. Authorities are still fallible & risk banning over unpopular/debatable expressions that may turn out true. There was unpopular dissent over covid lockdown policies in the US despite some dramatic differences with EU policies. Pro-palestinian protests get cracked down. Authorities are vulnerable to biases & swayed. Moreover, when people can just share their falsehoods offline, attempting to ban them online is hard to justify. If print media, through its decline, is being held legally responsible Print media is a controlled medium that controls it writers & approves everything before printing. It has a prepared, coordinated message. They can & do print books full of falsehoods if they want. Social media is open communication where anyone in the entire public can freely post anything before it is revoked. They aren't claiming to spread the truth, merely to enable communication.
  • 77 Stimmen
    22 Beiträge
    94 Aufrufe
    F
    https://web.archive.org/web/20250526132003/https://www.yahoo.com/news/cias-communications-suffered-catastrophic-compromise-started-iran-090018710.html?ref=404media.co
  • 62 Stimmen
    6 Beiträge
    40 Aufrufe
    W
    What could possibly go wrong? Edit: reads like the substrate still needs to be introduced first