Skip to content

Disney+ Confirmed a NEW Change Coming Soon for Subscribers

Technology
16 15 155
  • 195 Stimmen
    70 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    ambiguousprops@lemmy.todayA
    We can definitely afford it, especially with LUDs plus federal subsidies. That's literally what they're for.
  • 356 Stimmen
    135 Beiträge
    360 Aufrufe
    S
    Storing power is expensive and many energy storage techniques require a lot of resources to produce. The more we move toward solar generation, the more we should plan on being opportunistic with energy when it is plentiful For example, electrolysis isn't the most efficient way to store power, but if energy is cheap, it may be better on net to do it opportunistically when there's excess energy and use that hydrogen for things like producing artificial butter (and perhaps fuel mobile equipment like forklifts and delivery trucks). Cows aren't particularly efficient at turning biomass into human food. There's a ton of waste in the process, and they need a lot of space. A factory doesn't need to sustain life of an organism, it just needs to turn one set of compounds into another. Maybe it's not there now, but getting it there will be a lot easier than genetically engineering a much better cow.
  • 147 Stimmen
    17 Beiträge
    38 Aufrufe
    M
    Good if true, but of course they'll find a scapegoat for this, as all big corporations do.
  • What’s next for narcolepsy? Exciting new drugs on the horizon

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    28 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    11 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 133 Stimmen
    11 Beiträge
    67 Aufrufe
    S
    Leaving in the hat is a nice touch.
  • Tech Giants Team Up With Teachers Union on $23M AI Academy

    Technology technology
    3
    1
    8 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    48 Aufrufe
    D
    incorrect assessment: unions will gladly collaborate with 3rd party corps if it benefits them. Also unions protect interests of their members, not entire humanity...
  • Firefox 140 Brings Tab Unload, Custom Search & New ESR

    Technology technology
    41
    1
    234 Stimmen
    41 Beiträge
    574 Aufrufe
    S
    Read again. I quoted something along the lines of "just as much a development decision as a marketing one" and I said, it wasn't a development decision, so what's left? Firefox released just as frequently before, just that they didn’t increase the major version that often. This does not appear to be true. Why don't you take a look at the version history instead of some marketing blog post? https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/releases/ Version 2 had 20 releases within 730 days, averaging one release every 36.5 days. Version 3 had 19 releases within 622 days, averaging 32.7 days per release. But these releases were unscheduled, so they were released when they were done. Now they are on a fixed 90-day schedule, no matter if anything worthwhile was complete or not, plus hotfix releases whenever they are necessary. That's not faster, but instead scheduled, and also they are incrementing the major version even if no major change was included. That's what the blog post was alluding to. In the before times, a major version number increase indicated major changes. Now it doesn't anymore, which means sysadmins still need to consider each release a major release, even if it doesn't contain major changes because it might contain them and the version name doesn't say anything about whether it does or not. It's nothing but a marketing change, moving from "version numbering means something" to "big number go up".
  • Covert Web-to-App Tracking via Localhost on Android

    Technology technology
    2
    43 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    34 Aufrufe
    M
    Thanks for sharing this, it is an interesting read (though an additional comment about what this about would have been helpful). I want to say I am glad I do not use either of these services but Yandex implementation seems so bad that it does not matter, as any app could receive their data