Skip to content

This is expensive and time consuming

Technology
32 19 8
  • 22 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    S
    I would say go with whatever company that doesn't have a CEO throwing Nazi salutes.
  • 8 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    D
    Right? The surprise would be if they weren't doing that.
  • 95 Stimmen
    11 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    abnormalhumanbeing@lemmy.abnormalbeings.spaceA
    Haven't had an FP6 in my hands yet, but I've been using FP since the Fairphone 2, am currently using the FP4 and besides the ethics in sourcing their materials and manufacturing (which they genuinely attempt to provide, and while there is no ethical consumption in capitalism, there are still degrees of fucked-upness.), I do enjoy the repairability, longevity and long-term support. They are also decently supported by de-googled-android and even pure Linux phone operating systems, if you want to experiment there, and come without a lot of bloat that nowadays is ubiquitous with most smartphones.
  • Fully remote control your Nissan Leaf (or other modern cars)

    Technology technology
    7
    1
    28 Stimmen
    7 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    I
    It is not just EVs, this can be done on almost every new car in some form or another.
  • 1k Stimmen
    140 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    G
    I know that because I do a lot of street photography and there is no law in the UK forbidding photography of people in public spaces, I didn't write there was one. It sounds like you "know" that photography is "protected" because you need that to be true. it’s quite easy for you to Google this Indeed. For anyone who's not good at googling things, I recommend the UK ICO. but I can’t provide you with a law condoning it as that’s not how it works. That's true. You can't because you are wrong. You should know that your take on the GDPR is nonsense. It sounds like you violate it on a habitual basis. Again show me in GDPR where it expressly forbids marching a face to a public dataset. What do you mean "again"? The GDPR forbids this in, of course, Article 6 and, more particularly, Article 9, but also gives exceptions.
  • 359 Stimmen
    109 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    G
    If I understand correctly they are ruling you can by a book once, and redistribute the information to as many people you want without consequences. Aka 1 student should be able to buy a textbook and redistribute it to all other students for free. (Yet the rules only work for companies apparently, as the students would still be committing a crime) Well, it would be interesting if this case would be used as precedence in a case invonving a single student that do the same thing. But you are right
  • Software is evolving backwards

    Technology technology
    36
    1
    256 Stimmen
    36 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    venus_ziegenfalle@feddit.orgV
    It depends. A chatbot is kinda gimmicky, I agree. But stuff like ocr, reverse image seach from current screen, voice to text and probably more can be nicely combined into one assistant app. Google assistant used to come close to that, so did the old Cortana (although not quite as versatile). They didn't reinvent the wheel but they were genuinely convenient.
  • 1k Stimmen
    170 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    D
    some dude out of Silicon Valley hears about this, and hacks up a system that just uses a $30 webcam, an AI model that detects fingers (trained exclusively on pudgy white fingers of Silicon Valley executives) Hotdog / not hotdog