Iran asks its people to delete WhatsApp
Technology
25
Beiträge
21
Kommentatoren
94
Aufrufe
-
They are basically at war with the US and there is this piece of US Tech that nearly everyone is carrying around and that can access their communications, precise location, microphone and camera.
It's also owned by a company, Meta, that has a history of being used as a tool to manipulate public opinion.
I have no particular sympathy for Iran's leadership but I can understand why they would advice that (and I don't think WhatsApp is the only way for people to communicate with the outside world).Okay so they uninstall WhatsApp? What operating systems are they using and what countries are the manufacturers for those based in?
-
Signal is a much better choice and its basically a whatsapp clone.
other way around. Whatsapp is a signal clone.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Mossad angry
-
Okay so they uninstall WhatsApp? What operating systems are they using and what countries are the manufacturers for those based in?
I get what you mean and it's a fair point. But I would still go with Meta as the most immediate threat in a war with the US.
As the ignorant I am, my understanding is that the phone manufacturer has a level of control on the way Android works and so it wouldn't be as easy for Google to access any individual Samsung or Xiaomi phone as it is for Meta with WhatsApp, an app they fully control with permissions to use (way too many) phone features regardless of brand.
Plus, getting both Google and Apple to cooperate and coordinate sounds harder to me than just going to one company, that is basically controlled by only one person.
-
Okay so they uninstall WhatsApp? What operating systems are they using and what countries are the manufacturers for those based in?
They are probably using Xiaomi which is based in China, using AOSP with whatever mods they throw on it, which isn't based anywhere and is open source, or it could be Huawei too.
-
other way around. Whatsapp is a signal clone.
Huh? I was curious about this and looked up the wikis only. However, WhatsApp initial release was 16 years ago and Signal initial release was 10 years ago. It also appears in the history that WhatsApp had a version on iOS in 2009 while Signal didn’t have anything for Android until 2010 (under Whisper I believe).
I’m trying to figure out how either is a clone of the other when they were developed around the same times. It seems the idea was just a similar idea from two different entities.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Wouldn't want those pesky citizens having the ability to communicate securely, would we !
-
Signal is a much better choice and its basically a whatsapp clone.
Signal is a much better choice and its basically a whatsapp clone.
Must be why signal runs on the WhatsApp protocol
-
Huh? I was curious about this and looked up the wikis only. However, WhatsApp initial release was 16 years ago and Signal initial release was 10 years ago. It also appears in the history that WhatsApp had a version on iOS in 2009 while Signal didn’t have anything for Android until 2010 (under Whisper I believe).
I’m trying to figure out how either is a clone of the other when they were developed around the same times. It seems the idea was just a similar idea from two different entities.
The clone comment likely refers to the underlying architecture, as WhatsApp is using the signal protocol for its 'secured' messaging. Of the two, signal is the far superior choice for anyone not forced to live in Zucco's World. It's the more private option, and is secure by default unlike a lot of apps (namely, telegram).
WhatsApp (thankfully) is secure by default now according to Google, but it took them a hot minute to get to that point. That being said, you're still giving metadata to Zucc no matter what, which is still really bad to give the guy working on military AI...
-
The clone comment likely refers to the underlying architecture, as WhatsApp is using the signal protocol for its 'secured' messaging. Of the two, signal is the far superior choice for anyone not forced to live in Zucco's World. It's the more private option, and is secure by default unlike a lot of apps (namely, telegram).
WhatsApp (thankfully) is secure by default now according to Google, but it took them a hot minute to get to that point. That being said, you're still giving metadata to Zucc no matter what, which is still really bad to give the guy working on military AI...
Ah. Thank you for that bit of information. I didn’t go super deep because I was mostly just curious about the clone comment and learning a little more about each platform.
-
For once I can see eye to eye with a murderous theocratic regime.
Yeah, that happens sometimes.
-
Wouldn't want those pesky citizens having the ability to communicate securely, would we !
Communicate securely with WhatsApp? That's an oxymoron.
