Skip to content

YouTube might slow down your videos if you block ads

Technology
211 145 0
  • Palantir hits new highs amid Israel-Iran conflict

    Technology technology
    3
    1
    22 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    A
    I mean, if only anyone could see the obvious bullshit we're headed into. There's a lot of money to be made during times of war. Unfortunately the people that are pushing us in that direction are some very short sighted individuals that genuinely believe that once their actions have driven humans to the brink of extinction, they'll still be perfectly content in an underground bunker with shitty AI robots that break a month or so in, and all the stockpiled vacuum sealed resources they can hoard. Or alternatively, dying while attempting to colonize mars. That's who humanity will be relying to continue our legacy. The kind of person that thinks they are chosen elite, and there is nothing they cannot achieve. All bc they climbed mount Everest once while paying a team of Sherpas to risk their own lives and do everything for them.
  • 212 Stimmen
    27 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    P
    If that’s the case, it should be easy enough for you to come up with an actual argument against it.
  • 119 Stimmen
    34 Beiträge
    1 Aufrufe
    S
    A fairer comparison would be Eliza vs ChatGPT.
  • iFixit says the Switch 2 is even harder to repair than the original

    Technology technology
    126
    1
    699 Stimmen
    126 Beiträge
    14 Aufrufe
    Y
    My understanding is that if they've lasted at least a month and haven't died on you, you probably got a "good" batch and what you have now will be what it stays as for the most part, but a fair number of gulikits just sort of crap out at the 1-2 mo mark. So heads up on that.
  • Affordable Assignments

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    4 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 146 Stimmen
    37 Beiträge
    4 Aufrufe
    D
    Self hosted Sunshine and Moonlight is the way to go.
  • 463 Stimmen
    94 Beiträge
    2 Aufrufe
    L
    Make them publishers or whatever is required to have it be a legal requirement, have them ban people who share false information. The law doesn't magically make open discussions not open. By design, social media is open. If discussion from the public is closed, then it's no longer social media. ban people who share false information Banning people doesn't stop falsehoods. It's a broken solution promoting a false assurance. Authorities are still fallible & risk banning over unpopular/debatable expressions that may turn out true. There was unpopular dissent over covid lockdown policies in the US despite some dramatic differences with EU policies. Pro-palestinian protests get cracked down. Authorities are vulnerable to biases & swayed. Moreover, when people can just share their falsehoods offline, attempting to ban them online is hard to justify. If print media, through its decline, is being held legally responsible Print media is a controlled medium that controls it writers & approves everything before printing. It has a prepared, coordinated message. They can & do print books full of falsehoods if they want. Social media is open communication where anyone in the entire public can freely post anything before it is revoked. They aren't claiming to spread the truth, merely to enable communication.
  • 17 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    2 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet