Skip to content

Taiwan adds China’s Huawei, SMIC to export blacklist

Technology
43 13 132
  • Broadcom Eyes $2 Trillion Club as AI Chip Demand Explodes

    Technology technology
    2
    1
    38 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    4 Aufrufe
    I
    Selling shovels in a gold rush, can't say I blame them.
  • 18 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    16 Aufrufe
    J
    Pretty cool stuff, thanks for sharing!
  • Queer Dating Apps: Beware Who You Trust With Your Intimate Data

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    72 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    9 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Could Windows and installed apps upload all my personal files?

    Technology technology
    2
    1 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    15 Aufrufe
    rikudou@lemmings.worldR
    Yes, every application has access to everything. The only exception are those weird apps that use the universal framework or whatever that thing is called, those need to ask for permissions. But most of the apps on your PC have full access to everything. And Windows does collect and upload a lot of personal information and they could easily upload everything on your system. The same of course applies for the apps as well, they have access to everything except privileged folders (those usually don't contain your personal data, but system files).
  • 88 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    20 Aufrufe
    gnulinuxdude@lemmy.mlG
    I have never used a food delivery service because they all feel so fucking scummy and exploitative. Seems like they are in equal need as we are for regulatory overhaul of this business practice.
  • Why so much hate toward AI?

    Technology technology
    73
    38 Stimmen
    73 Beiträge
    134 Aufrufe
    H
    AI has only one problem to solve: salaries
  • 462 Stimmen
    94 Beiträge
    163 Aufrufe
    L
    Make them publishers or whatever is required to have it be a legal requirement, have them ban people who share false information. The law doesn't magically make open discussions not open. By design, social media is open. If discussion from the public is closed, then it's no longer social media. ban people who share false information Banning people doesn't stop falsehoods. It's a broken solution promoting a false assurance. Authorities are still fallible & risk banning over unpopular/debatable expressions that may turn out true. There was unpopular dissent over covid lockdown policies in the US despite some dramatic differences with EU policies. Pro-palestinian protests get cracked down. Authorities are vulnerable to biases & swayed. Moreover, when people can just share their falsehoods offline, attempting to ban them online is hard to justify. If print media, through its decline, is being held legally responsible Print media is a controlled medium that controls it writers & approves everything before printing. It has a prepared, coordinated message. They can & do print books full of falsehoods if they want. Social media is open communication where anyone in the entire public can freely post anything before it is revoked. They aren't claiming to spread the truth, merely to enable communication.
  • 588 Stimmen
    77 Beiträge
    105 Aufrufe
    F
    When a Lemmy instance owner gets a legal request from a foreign countries government to take down content, after they’re done shitting themselves they’ll take the content down or they’ll have to implement a country wide block on that country, along with not allowing any citizens of that country to use their instance no matter where they are located. Block me, I don’t care. You’re just proving that you can’t handle the truth and being challenged with it.