Skip to content

Brain-computer interfaces: Brain implants are letting people move, speak, and interact with machines using only their thoughts. The first FDA approvals may arrive within five years.

Technology
23 20 0
  • xAI Data Center Emits Plumes of Pollution, New Video Shows

    Technology technology
    37
    1
    425 Stimmen
    37 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    bahnd@lemmy.worldB
    We have similar products where I work as well, they are just expensive thermal imaging cameras. They would not be able to identify the chemical contents of a gas cloud at a distance, just that there was a cloud. The point is that in the age of digital media, its very hard to prove anything is what you say it is. Between photoshop and AI making a mess of the digital media landscape, it makes things increasingly difficult to validate, and shouting "do your own reaserch" will only add to the ambiguity as the internet is not static and can be changed by anyone at any time.
  • 691 Stimmen
    140 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    H
    Maybe I don't want you to stop, big boy.
  • Amazon is reportedly training humanoid robots to deliver packages

    Technology technology
    143
    1
    300 Stimmen
    143 Beiträge
    13 Aufrufe
    M
    Yup, and people seem to frequently underestimate how ridiculously expensive running a fleet of humanoid robots would be (and don’t seem to realize how comparatively low the manual labor it’d replace is paid.)
  • Ispace of Japan’s Moon Lander Resilience Has Crashed

    Technology technology
    2
    1
    37 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    3 Aufrufe
    M
    $ ls space?
  • 0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    1 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 463 Stimmen
    94 Beiträge
    2 Aufrufe
    L
    Make them publishers or whatever is required to have it be a legal requirement, have them ban people who share false information. The law doesn't magically make open discussions not open. By design, social media is open. If discussion from the public is closed, then it's no longer social media. ban people who share false information Banning people doesn't stop falsehoods. It's a broken solution promoting a false assurance. Authorities are still fallible & risk banning over unpopular/debatable expressions that may turn out true. There was unpopular dissent over covid lockdown policies in the US despite some dramatic differences with EU policies. Pro-palestinian protests get cracked down. Authorities are vulnerable to biases & swayed. Moreover, when people can just share their falsehoods offline, attempting to ban them online is hard to justify. If print media, through its decline, is being held legally responsible Print media is a controlled medium that controls it writers & approves everything before printing. It has a prepared, coordinated message. They can & do print books full of falsehoods if they want. Social media is open communication where anyone in the entire public can freely post anything before it is revoked. They aren't claiming to spread the truth, merely to enable communication.
  • Stack overflow is almost dead

    Technology technology
    5
    0 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    2 Aufrufe
    ineedmana@lemmy.worldI
    students When I was a student I despised the idea of typeless var in C#. Then a few years later at my day job I fully embraced C++ auto. I understand the frustration but unfortunately being wrong is part of learning
  • Revolutionary cooling technology emerges from Slovenia

    Technology technology
    8
    43 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    3 Aufrufe
    S
    You know what's even cheaper to run than this "new technology"? Breathy promotion pieces that give no evidence whatsoever to support it's claims. Way to go, PR folks.