ChatGPT 'got absolutely wrecked' by Atari 2600 in beginner's chess match — OpenAI's newest model bamboozled by 1970s logic
Technology
204
Beiträge
136
Kommentatoren
5.9k
Aufrufe
-
This post did not contain any content.
I suppose it's an interesting experiment, but it's not that surprising that a word prediction machine can't play chess.
-
I suppose it's an interesting experiment, but it's not that surprising that a word prediction machine can't play chess.
Because people want to feel superior because they
don't know how to use a ChatBotcan count the number of "r"s in the word "strawberry", lol -
This post did not contain any content.
A strange game. How about a nice game of Global Thermonuclear War?
-
There was a chess game for the Atari 2600?
I wanna see them W I D E pieces.
I wasn't aware of that either, now I'm kinda curious to try to find it in my 512 Atari 2600 ROMs archive..
-
This post did not contain any content.
I'm often impressed at how good chatGPT is at generating text, but I'll admit it's hilariously terrible at chess. It loves to manifest pieces out of thin air, or make absurd illegal moves, like jumping its king halfway across the board and claiming checkmate
-
There was a chess game for the Atari 2600?
I wanna see them W I D E pieces.
Prepare to be delighted. Full disclosure, my Atari isn't hooked up and also I don't have the Video Chess cart even if it was, so this was fetched from Google Images.
-
Prepare to be delighted. Full disclosure, my Atari isn't hooked up and also I don't have the Video Chess cart even if it was, so this was fetched from Google Images.
Those are some funky looking knights lol
-
Because people want to feel superior because they
don't know how to use a ChatBotcan count the number of "r"s in the word "strawberry", lolYeah, just because I can't count the number of r's in the word strawberry doesn't mean I shouldn't be put in charge of the US nuclear arsenal!
-
This post did not contain any content.
They used ChatGPT 4o, instead of using o1 or o3.
Obviously it was going to fail.
-
Did the author thinks ChatGPT is in fact an AGI? It's a chatbot. Why would it be good at chess? It's like saying an Atari 2600 running a dedicated chess program can beat Google Maps at chess.
AI including ChatGPT is being marketed as super awesome at everything, which is why that and similar AI is being forced into absolutely everything and being sold as a replacement for people.
Something marketed as AGI should be treated as AGI when proving it isn't AGI.
-
Did the author thinks ChatGPT is in fact an AGI? It's a chatbot. Why would it be good at chess? It's like saying an Atari 2600 running a dedicated chess program can beat Google Maps at chess.
Most people do. It's just called AI in the media everywhere and marketing works. I think online folks forget that something as simple as getting a Lemmy account by yourself puts you into the top quintile of tech literacy.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Next, pit ChatGPT against 1K ZX Chess in a ZX81.
-
Those are some funky looking knights lol
Never seen a snake/horse hybrid before?
-
A strange game. How about a nice game of Global Thermonuclear War?
No thank you. The only winning move is not to play
-
There was a chess game for the Atari 2600?
I wanna see them W I D E pieces.
Here you go (online emulator): https://www.retrogames.cz/play_716-Atari2600.php
-
Did the author thinks ChatGPT is in fact an AGI? It's a chatbot. Why would it be good at chess? It's like saying an Atari 2600 running a dedicated chess program can beat Google Maps at chess.
I think that’s generally the point is most people thing chat GPT is this sentient thing that knows everything and… no.
-
This post did not contain any content.
This isn't the strength of gpt-o4 the model has been optimised for tool use as an agent. That's why its so good at image gen relative to other models it uses tools to construct an image piece by piece similar to a human. Also probably poor system prompting. A LLM is not a universal thinking machine its a a universal process machine. An LLM understands the process and uses tools to accomplish the process hence its strengths in writing code (especially as an agent).
Its similar to how a monkey is infinitely better at remembering a sequence of numbers than a human ever could but is totally incapable of even comprehending writing down numbers.
-
The Atari chess program can play chess better than the Boeing 747 too. And better than the North Pole. Amazing!
Are either of those marketed as powerful AI?
-
The Atari chess program can play chess better than the Boeing 747 too. And better than the North Pole. Amazing!
Neither of those things are marketed as being artificially intelligent.
-
AI including ChatGPT is being marketed as super awesome at everything, which is why that and similar AI is being forced into absolutely everything and being sold as a replacement for people.
Something marketed as AGI should be treated as AGI when proving it isn't AGI.
Not to help the AI companies, but why don't they program them to look up math programs and outsource chess to other programs when they're asked for that stuff? It's obvious they're shit at it, why do they answer anyway? It's because they're programmed by know-it-all programmers, isn't it.
