autofocus glasses
Technology
53
Beiträge
29
Kommentatoren
25
Aufrufe
-
Because they are a medical device and there are negative medical repercussions to using glasses that don't conform to your needed prescription.
I can go buy readers when I don't need them. I've been told that using a higher power than you need is bad for you as well. And you can buy glasses online with no script. So I don't think that reason would be valid.
-
My neighbor just bought a pair off of tv, theyre a scam, just +25 reading glasses..
Yeah, my wife got me something that claimed to auto focus. Was just a pair of progressive readers.
-
As a driver with short sight and glasses, if my glasses fall off I'm not suddenly blind - I just can't read license places or signs. Traffic lights, other cars etc are still pretty obvious.
I also am short sighted, though possibly a bit worse than you given your description. If my glasses suddenly fell off there are plenty of hazards I would potentially miss. Idiot kid about to run into the road, etc.
-
You can do that with this novel technology called "a second pair of glasses for reading".
Alternatively, if you don't want to constantly adjust because you only need to read something quick, try taking off your glasses and squinting.
Could save you thousands of dollars and hours on the line with technical support.
You can do that with this novel technology called "a second pair of glasses for reading".
It works, I can confirm it.
-
you'll look like the king of nerds, but that's a thing:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adjustable-focus_eyeglassesPics for the lazy
-
Is that the same as Progressives? I have them. I hate the areas that don't work on the sides. People get used to them I guess, but I don’t have to wear mine most of the time. And even if you are used to it, that means you have some distorted peripheral vision when you wear them.
They can be depending on your vision issues. Mine are essentially bifocals where the reading portion isn't visible. If I focus there's a tiny fuzzy line where the readers meet the normal lens.
To be honest I wasn't aware of the sides issue and it seems you might have different problem that requires a third lens.
-
As a driver with short sight and glasses, if my glasses fall off I'm not suddenly blind - I just can't read license places or signs. Traffic lights, other cars etc are still pretty obvious.
My sister can't see the big E on the old school eye charts.
My kid barely can, as well. They're practically blind without glasses.
-
As a guy closing in on 50, losing my near vision really annoys me. And the current solutions are weak at best, which annoys me even more. These and the other companies working on similar sound great.
But someone tell me why I would need a prescription for them? And is that true in the EU? The article makes it sound like getting them approved to be prescribed is a big hurdle. They seem like better reading glasses, which I don't need a prescription to buy."Prescription glasses" only mean "glasses with optical properties", so glasses that actually do anything with focus, as opposed to e.g. non-prescription sunglasses or non-prescription accessory glasses that people wear to look smart or something.
It doesn't mean you need a prescription for them.
(That said: in some countries you need a prescription for your prescription glasses if you want your health insurance to pay for them.)
-
Can't you buy colored contacts with no correction? Seems like if you can do that, the issue with your ryes being unsuitable isn't the reason.
Valid point. Which makes it even dumber that I can't buy corrective lenses with a prescription a doctor once gave me that arbitrarily expired. It's not like eye prescriptions tend to change significantly, and if it's like other drug prescriptions, no need to worry about me growing an addiction to contacts, I'm already there.
-
They can be depending on your vision issues. Mine are essentially bifocals where the reading portion isn't visible. If I focus there's a tiny fuzzy line where the readers meet the normal lens.
To be honest I wasn't aware of the sides issue and it seems you might have different problem that requires a third lens.
Hm. Checking my glasses I think there is something on the top too. I can see distance ever so slightly clearer looking out the top. If I remember right, I have a minus .25 in one eye. Always been told it didn't need correction, but maybe it is in this pair. I should go get some off the shelf progressive readers and try those.
-
-
Trump extends the TikTok ban deadline for a third time; there is no legal basis for the extensions and it is unclear how many times the deadline can be extended
Technology
1
-
-
-
Meta shareholders overwhelmingly rejected a proposal to explore adding Bitcoin to the company's treasury, with less than 1% voting in favor of the measure
Technology
1
-
-
-
