Such interesting videos on such nostalgic pieces of technology too. I could listen to him ramble about this stuff all day (and I have).

They are constantly changing, but one could probably get pretty far focusing on ChatGPT (which is what most "lazy" authors use). And there are already efforts in this domain from the community, see the "slop" profiles in EQ bench: https://eqbench.com/creative_writing.html Traditional LLMs would be better suited (ironically) for fact checking, eg they check for citations, then go to follow the links and see if it matches the text. They're also much better at "checking" for sanity than actually writing it out. An obviously this would just be a first pass for a person to quickly confirm.

Iinitially called bullshit since you provided no sources, but according to Wikipedia, you are correct https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Orbital

It is interesting that you are not answering my point... Good work

The writers alleged in the complaint that Microsoft used a collection of nearly 200,000 pirated books to train Megatron, an algorithm that gives text responses to user prompts. Which Megatron are we referring to? This [image: c747568b-0dd5-431e-bd19-2fbfdf5d372c.webp] Or This [image: 735a9693-ec67-489c-92f6-addb803291a4.webp]

Republicans are the biggest suckers there are. There's a reason as soon as the jig is up grifters pivot to conservative talking points.