Skip to content

China's first 6nm GPU boots up, targets performance parity with RTX 4060

Technology
22 15 190
  • This post did not contain any content.

    I'm looking forward to getting a low cost Chinese GPU; Lets see how much time it takes for these to become competitive with Nvidia or AMD.

  • Ooh, more baseless claims of China's technological advancement.

    I'll file this in the bullshit folder with the rest of their bullshit claims.

    I wish their claims were true. There is not enough competition right now.

  • Big...if true. This article is long on claims but utterly bereft of proof.

    As usual with very much wow inventions from China.

    Not to say that they don't have clever people there doing cool stuff. It's just my experience that such articles are often overselling something which does not live up to the claims.

  • As usual with very much wow inventions from China.

    Not to say that they don't have clever people there doing cool stuff. It's just my experience that such articles are often overselling something which does not live up to the claims.

    Even if the hardware does....drivers matter. I'm reminded of the Moore Threads MTT S80.

  • I'm looking forward to getting a low cost Chinese GPU; Lets see how much time it takes for these to become competitive with Nvidia or AMD.

    I agree, if this could make good GPU's more affordable, that would be great.

  • WTF!? OK they had the 7nm process for more than a year now, but 6nm without EUV?

    I'm not an expert, but it seems to me that when China cracks EUV, which they allegedly are getting close to, then SMIC will progress fast to even better processes.

    China is making very good progress, especially considering they cannot use any western equipment. Everything has to be home grown!

    but 6nm without EUV?

    I read elsewhere that 5nm was already done (in the lab, not on industrial levels), and they're planning on 3nm by 2026.

    The workaround seems to be to use particle accelerators instead of EUV machines. More expensive and with lower yield, but it'll do the job.

  • but 6nm without EUV?

    I read elsewhere that 5nm was already done (in the lab, not on industrial levels), and they're planning on 3nm by 2026.

    The workaround seems to be to use particle accelerators instead of EUV machines. More expensive and with lower yield, but it'll do the job.

    Yes 5nm should be ready this year, and allegedly Huawei is planning a 3nm product to be produced by SMIC already next year!
    That's a very bold schedule, but maybe they expect to have something close to ASML EUV soon?

  • As usual with very much wow inventions from China.

    Not to say that they don't have clever people there doing cool stuff. It's just my experience that such articles are often overselling something which does not live up to the claims.

    Huawei has sold a lot of phones last year based on "surprising advances" from SMIC. They have shipping AI chips that are benchmarked based on announcements that drew skepticism at the time. Not sure about this company's product or how close it is to shipping.

  • Isn't GAA one of the most advanced types?
    If they can really do this next year, there is no doubt China must have their own EUV lights.

    So 6nm for example might just be a slightly refined 7nm node.

    Absolutely true but AFAIK SMIC usually make their numbers comparable to TSMC. Even Intel changed their numbering to follow TSMC, and SAMSUNG and TSMC have always been close in their numbering.

    We will have to see if the process is actually good, but I have little doubt that China will become competitive in EUV within 5 years. But if they have it already next year, that will be very fast.

    GAA is the next evolution of transistor architecture from FinFET, but as far as I know has no direct link to smaller process nodes. In that (to my understanding) it doesn't require small nodes and could be used just as easily in larger ones. It's just that it is more difficult so until now there were other easier ways to make progress. However with new nodes getting more expensive and giving less scaling gaa and other things like backside power delivery are being pursued.

    We will have to see if the process is actually good, but I have little doubt that China will become competitive in EUV within 5 years. But if they have it already next year, that will be very fast.

    So not only do you expect China to have a working domestically produced EUV machine within 5 years, but a competitive one? Or possibly even next year?

    Next year is just pure fantasy that I don't think even the most optimistic would assume. If they were anywhere close to that we would already know. They'd have shown a working prototype by now.

    Euv is crazy difficult and you not only the result of a single company ASML, but many highly specialized companies that are leaders in their respective fields and all over the world like e.g. Zeiss for for the lenses. So for China to replicate it domestically they'd need to copy the whole supply chain. Which is orders of magnitude more difficult than what they've done in other industries like electric vehicles or solar panels.

    Imo if they have a working prototype of a complete EUV machine within this decade it would already be impressive. But that would still be far off from mass production or wherever the industry is by then (Intel is currently trialing high na EUV). Also for reference Wikipedia says ASML had their first prototype in 2006 and we know how long it took to being that to mass production. China as a second mover might have an edge that speed things up, but just knowing how it works in theory isn't enough and there are o shortcuts.

    But maybe they also pursue another technique such as nano imprint (like canon) to achieve smaller nodes. Maybe that would be easier to replicate without existing global supply chains.

  • GAA is the next evolution of transistor architecture from FinFET, but as far as I know has no direct link to smaller process nodes. In that (to my understanding) it doesn't require small nodes and could be used just as easily in larger ones. It's just that it is more difficult so until now there were other easier ways to make progress. However with new nodes getting more expensive and giving less scaling gaa and other things like backside power delivery are being pursued.

    We will have to see if the process is actually good, but I have little doubt that China will become competitive in EUV within 5 years. But if they have it already next year, that will be very fast.

    So not only do you expect China to have a working domestically produced EUV machine within 5 years, but a competitive one? Or possibly even next year?

    Next year is just pure fantasy that I don't think even the most optimistic would assume. If they were anywhere close to that we would already know. They'd have shown a working prototype by now.

    Euv is crazy difficult and you not only the result of a single company ASML, but many highly specialized companies that are leaders in their respective fields and all over the world like e.g. Zeiss for for the lenses. So for China to replicate it domestically they'd need to copy the whole supply chain. Which is orders of magnitude more difficult than what they've done in other industries like electric vehicles or solar panels.

    Imo if they have a working prototype of a complete EUV machine within this decade it would already be impressive. But that would still be far off from mass production or wherever the industry is by then (Intel is currently trialing high na EUV). Also for reference Wikipedia says ASML had their first prototype in 2006 and we know how long it took to being that to mass production. China as a second mover might have an edge that speed things up, but just knowing how it works in theory isn't enough and there are o shortcuts.

    But maybe they also pursue another technique such as nano imprint (like canon) to achieve smaller nodes. Maybe that would be easier to replicate without existing global supply chains.

    AFAIK Canon has a process (nano imprint) that competes with EUV too, maybe not as advanced as ASML.
    When I say China will have a competitive EUV system within 5 years, I don't mean competitive in how advanced it is compared to the best ASML has to offer like the new NA process TSMC hasn't even decided to buy yet.
    But an EUV that allows a production process that will be competitive down to just below 2nm. Meaning competitive with the EUV process TSMC is currently using.
    Depending on how much China is investing in this, they could be working on different processes in parallel.
    Obviously anything as hard as this with a 5 year time span is very uncertain, we recently saw how bad things went for Intel with their 10nm process, being both multiple years delayed, and on top of that pretty bad when they finally announced it was ready.

    As I stated next year would be very fast, but in reality we don't know how close they are. Your claim that they would advertise it is speculation. What would be the purpose of that?

    China is already competitive in 8 out of 10 key industries, and since China is prevented from even using western parts for chip making or even just buying the chips, they are pulling ressources to catch up. China will do this because they have massive talent mass and ressources, and because they have to.

  • This post did not contain any content.

    Just ordered a thousand dollars worth of GPU (a single unit lol). Would i have gotten a chinese GPU for half the price if they advertised similar performance ?

    No.

  • Ooh, more baseless claims of China's technological advancement.

    I'll file this in the bullshit folder with the rest of their bullshit claims.

    .

  • AFAIK Canon has a process (nano imprint) that competes with EUV too, maybe not as advanced as ASML.
    When I say China will have a competitive EUV system within 5 years, I don't mean competitive in how advanced it is compared to the best ASML has to offer like the new NA process TSMC hasn't even decided to buy yet.
    But an EUV that allows a production process that will be competitive down to just below 2nm. Meaning competitive with the EUV process TSMC is currently using.
    Depending on how much China is investing in this, they could be working on different processes in parallel.
    Obviously anything as hard as this with a 5 year time span is very uncertain, we recently saw how bad things went for Intel with their 10nm process, being both multiple years delayed, and on top of that pretty bad when they finally announced it was ready.

    As I stated next year would be very fast, but in reality we don't know how close they are. Your claim that they would advertise it is speculation. What would be the purpose of that?

    China is already competitive in 8 out of 10 key industries, and since China is prevented from even using western parts for chip making or even just buying the chips, they are pulling ressources to catch up. China will do this because they have massive talent mass and ressources, and because they have to.

    Your claim that they would advertise it is speculation. What would be the purpose of that?

    To advertise that they can? In return what would be the purpose to hide it?

    They do seem to make their advancements at least somewhat public, e.g. with their recent progress with a EUV light source.

    I am probably on the pessimistic side and you maybe on the optimistic, so the reality will likely end up being somewhere in between (but only time will tell).

    China will do this because they have massive talent mass and ressources, and because they have to.

    Well it also was developed in the west by a large amount of talent and resources and still took a lot of time. But you are absolutely right that their hand is being forced.

    Restricting exports like this imo was a huge mistake, imo especially in regard to duv. In the end it might have achieved some damage in the short/medium term, but that wasn't anything the us could capitalize on and it also directly hurt ASMLs profits (meaning less resources to advance). And regardless how the timeline ends up looking on the end (be it closer to your or my prediction), physics are the same everywhere so that can't be restricted and they will eventually be able to figure it out.

  • Your claim that they would advertise it is speculation. What would be the purpose of that?

    To advertise that they can? In return what would be the purpose to hide it?

    They do seem to make their advancements at least somewhat public, e.g. with their recent progress with a EUV light source.

    I am probably on the pessimistic side and you maybe on the optimistic, so the reality will likely end up being somewhere in between (but only time will tell).

    China will do this because they have massive talent mass and ressources, and because they have to.

    Well it also was developed in the west by a large amount of talent and resources and still took a lot of time. But you are absolutely right that their hand is being forced.

    Restricting exports like this imo was a huge mistake, imo especially in regard to duv. In the end it might have achieved some damage in the short/medium term, but that wasn't anything the us could capitalize on and it also directly hurt ASMLs profits (meaning less resources to advance). And regardless how the timeline ends up looking on the end (be it closer to your or my prediction), physics are the same everywhere so that can't be restricted and they will eventually be able to figure it out.

    what would be the purpose to hide it?

    To avoid further retaliations from USA that might prevent their progress.
    And to not disclose industry secrets.

    I am probably on the pessimistic side and you maybe on the optimistic

    True, I'm an optimist on their behalf, because China has done such impressive progress already, but I also know this is way harder than sending a man to the moon.
    I agree 100% about restricting the tech is a huge mistake, and yes physics are indeed the same everywhere.
    Hopefully when China figures it out, consumers everywhere will benefit. The Political implications however, is an open question.

  • This post did not contain any content.

    Their previous GPU used an old AMD GPU design if I recall correctly. I wonder if they have in-house stuff now.

  • The overlooked global risk of the AI precariat

    Technology technology
    3
    5 Stimmen
    3 Beiträge
    16 Aufrufe
    cecilkorik@lemmy.caC
    It is explicitly intended to be, you only have to listen to them talk about it for that to be abundantly clear. Fuck, even ask an AI themselves and they'll tell you about the dangers of how it's being used. The only people saying it's not are the utopian dreamers who are expecting it to be something it's currently not and likely has no hope of ever being. This is not a utopia and the people creating these technologies are not utopians in the slightest, they are mercenary capitalists and they will instantly grind you into a paste without even a shred of remorse or even an acknowledgement that they've done so, if it helps them get their next dollar. Some of them only think about you in the abstract. Most of them don't think of you at all.
  • Easily Install Longhorn on Kubernetes

    Technology technology
    1
    2
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    6 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • What are the most in-demand Tech Skills? (besides AI)

    Technology technology
    5
    10 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    73 Aufrufe
    jordanlund@lemmy.worldJ
    AI is devaluing other skills. I got an email today, from my own company, telling me I wouldn't have to renew my professional certification for 2 years if I passed an unrelated test on AI. The "test" was 10 questions. Glad to know my professional certification is equivalent to a 10 question pop quiz on AI.
  • 106 Stimmen
    29 Beiträge
    402 Aufrufe
    tja@sh.itjust.worksT
    It seems there are already systems like this in place in the EU: https://sh.itjust.works/comment/20021267
  • New Orleans debates real-time facial recognition legislation

    Technology technology
    12
    1
    150 Stimmen
    12 Beiträge
    135 Aufrufe
    A
    [image: 62e40d75-1358-46a4-a7a5-1f08c6afe4dc.jpeg] Palantir had a contract with New Orleans starting around ~2012 to create their predictive policing tech that scans surveillance cameras for very vague details and still misidentifies people. It's very similar to Lavender, the tech they use to identify members of Hamas and attack with drones. This results in misidentified targets ~10% of the time, according to the IDF (likely it's a much higher misidentification rate than 10%). Palantir picked Louisiana over somewhere like San Francisco bc they knew it would be a lot easier to violate rights and privacy here and get away with it. Whatever they decide in New Orleans on Thursday during this Council meeting that nobody cares about, will likely be the first of its kind on the books legal basis to track civilians in the U.S. and allow the federal government to take control over that ability whenever they want. This could also set a precedent for use in other states. Guess who's running the entire country right now, and just gave high ranking army contracts to Palantir employees for "no reason" while they are also receiving a multimillion dollar federal contract to create an insane database on every American and giant data centers are being built all across the country.
  • XMPP vs everything else

    Technology technology
    10
    1
    43 Stimmen
    10 Beiträge
    103 Aufrufe
    M
    Conversely, I have seen this opinion expressed a few times. I can’t judge the accuracy but there seem to be more than a few people sharing it.
  • Science and Technology News and Commentary: Aardvark Daily

    Technology technology
    2
    7 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    34 Aufrufe
    I
    What are you on about with this? Last news post 2013?
  • 19 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    20 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet