Skip to content

Discord unveils Discord Orbs, a new in-app currency that users can earn by completing Quests, which reward participants who interact with ads

Technology
137 83 1.1k
  • Samsung Removes Bootloader Unlocking with One UI 8

    Technology technology
    29
    2
    143 Stimmen
    29 Beiträge
    277 Aufrufe
    S
    My Xiaomi Mi A1 sporting Android 13 says: "hold my beer… "
  • Why does technology create new problems for each one it solves?

    Technology technology
    15
    1
    60 Stimmen
    15 Beiträge
    65 Aufrufe
    R
    Not really, there's an OR logical element present in our world. Divide et impera, applied to engineering. For 80% of things this fast cool solution works, for 20% the simpler one works. The aggregating element to make using both in their own situations transparent reduces reliability just a bit, but the efficiency gain is visible. And the "80%" and "20%" solutions can further on too use such unifying elements to aggregate different solutions for them. To improve efficiency without additional failure points (except for aggregators). Nobody does that because the "80% solution" producer wants to capture you, they don't want alternatives, they want power, and it's a honeypot. It's up to you the customer to understand this. In the classical model. Also see customer associations, which are like unions inverted. Isn't it funny how we have big businesses organizing, but not labor and not customers? While for them it's much more important. As you can see, the aggregator is very important here. We need standards, so that all social media would compete with other social media in one interoperable world with standardized interfaces, all search engines would compete with other search engines in one interoperable world with standardized interfaces, all file hostings ... you get the idea.
  • 616 Stimmen
    254 Beiträge
    6k Aufrufe
    N
    That’s a very emphatic restatement of your initial claim. I can’t help but notice that, for all the fancy formatting, that wall of text doesn’t contain a single line which actually defines the difference between “learning” and “statistical optimization”. It just repeats the claim that they are different without supporting that claim in any way. Nothing in there, precludes the alternative hypothesis; that human learning is entirely (or almost entirely) an emergent property of “statistical optimization”. Without some definition of what the difference would be we can’t even theorize a test
  • SpaceX's Starship blows up ahead of 10th test flight

    Technology technology
    165
    1
    610 Stimmen
    165 Beiträge
    4k Aufrufe
    mycodesucks@lemmy.worldM
    In this case you happen to be right on both counts.
  • 582 Stimmen
    57 Beiträge
    725 Aufrufe
    arararagi@ani.socialA
    Because artists are still there.
  • 236 Stimmen
    80 Beiträge
    729 Aufrufe
    R
    Yeah, but that's a secondary attribute. The new ones are stupid front and center.
  • European Open Web Index goes public in June 2025

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    13 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    20 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 19 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    56 Aufrufe
    S
    Jesus that's just straight up porn