Skip to content

Indian Government orders censoring of accounts on X

Technology
12 5 106
  • 208 Stimmen
    30 Beiträge
    243 Aufrufe
    muusemuuse@sh.itjust.worksM
    “If we can just get rid of all the humans, I’ll have a machine that prints me free money!” This is all that the AI push is about. It really is that stupid. Nobody is going to ever pay for AI if they aren’t employed anymore.
  • Reddit executive Roxy Young is departing the social media company

    Technology technology
    6
    1
    70 Stimmen
    6 Beiträge
    59 Aufrufe
    R
    Sinking ship.
  • 8 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    19 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • We're Not Innovating, We’re Just Forgetting Slower

    Technology technology
    45
    1
    297 Stimmen
    45 Beiträge
    570 Aufrufe
    P
    … /results. I'm....not quite understanding you reply. I think you're trying to add on "results" to my statement of "cost/effort", but I covered "results" with my first statement of "features or functionality". So if I understand your post properly, I think your addition is simply duplicative of what I already included. Have I misunderstood what you're trying to communicate?
  • 737 Stimmen
    67 Beiträge
    929 Aufrufe
    K
    That has always been the two big problems with AI. Biases in the training, intentional or not, will always bias the output. And AI is incapable of saying "I do not have suffient training on this subject or reliable sources for it to give you a confident answer". It will always give you its best guess, even if it is completely hallucinating much of the data. The only way to identify the hallucinations if it isn't just saying absurd stuff on the face of it, it to do independent research to verify it, at which point you may as well have just researched it yourself in the first place. AI is a tool, and it can be a very powerful tool with the right training and use cases. For example, I use it at a software engineer to help me parse error codes when googling working or to give me code examples for modules I've never used. There is no small number of times it has been completely wrong, but in my particular use case, that is pretty easy to confirm very quickly. The code either works as expected or it doesn't, and code is always tested before releasing it anyway. In research, it is great at helping you find a relevant source for your research across the internet or in a specific database. It is usually very good at summarizing a source for you to get a quick idea about it before diving into dozens of pages. It CAN be good at helping you write your own papers in a LIMITED capacity, such as cleaning up your writing in your writing to make it clearer, correctly formatting your bibliography (with actual sources you provide or at least verify), etc. But you have to remember that it doesn't "know" anything at all. It isn't sentient, intelligent, thoughtful, or any other personification placed on AI. None of the information it gives you is trustworthy without verification. It can and will fabricate entire studies that do not exist even while attributed to real researcher. It can mix in unreliable information with reliable information becuase there is no difference to it. Put simply, it is not a reliable source of information... ever. Make sure you understand that.
  • Anthem Demo - Napster plus Distributed Machine Learning

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    7 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    18 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 4 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    18 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • The FDA Is Approving Drugs Without Evidence They Work

    Technology technology
    69
    1
    506 Stimmen
    69 Beiträge
    554 Aufrufe
    L
    Now you hit me curious too. This was my source on Texas https://www.texasalmanac.com/place-types/town Also the total number of total towns is over 4,000 with only 3k unincorporated, I did get the numbers wrong even in Texas. I had looked at Wikipedia but could not find totals, only lists