Skip to content

Supreme Court to decide whether ISPs must disconnect users accused of piracy

Technology
143 109 0
  • Cloudflare to AI Crawlers: Pay or be blocked

    Technology technology
    6
    1
    66 Stimmen
    6 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    D
    This has been tried before many times. The problem is that this exchange can never satisfy all of the parties. Would site host take 0.01$ for a page? If its Walmart.com then they'd happily lose even 0.10$ or more if competitors can't analyze their products and other perceived IP damages. For example, let's assume they do the business math and come out that if it is anything below 5$ is a no deal - what scraper would pay 5$ for a single product page scrape? Maybe openAI can pay that but is this what we want where public scraping is only accessible to billionaires? What if you're just a user that wants to track Walmart price to build your own budgeting script? Are you paying 5$ on every request? Now for creative content like blogs etc. it could actually work and micropayments have been holy grail here forever but what more likely to happen is that free content will outcompete paid because when LLM asks do you want to read this for free or pay 2$ for this other source 99% of the users will pick free because some unknown source has zero authority in the end user's eyes to justify this risk. What I suspect will happen is similar with what happened with SEO spam rise but it'll be a but better because LLMs are harder to game than Google. Most content will be free but have injected biases, shilling or other promotions or agendas to subsidize the costs. On the other hand a lot of content will remain high quality and free as a legitimate source for authority signaling within relevant industries which is already a big thing. Anyway thanks for coming to my ted talk
  • 223 Stimmen
    12 Beiträge
    0 Aufrufe
    A
    they may have bunkers as a contingency but i doubt they think that existence is inevitable.
  • You're not alone: This email from Google's Gemini team is concerning

    Technology technology
    298
    1
    836 Stimmen
    298 Beiträge
    69 Aufrufe
    M
    My understanding is that, in broad strokes... Aurora acts like a proxy or mirror that doesn't require you to sign in to get Google Play Store apps. It doesn't provide any other software besides what you specifically download from it, and it doesn't include any telemetry/tracking like normal Google Play Store would. microG is a reimplementation of Google Play services (the suite of proprietary background services that Google runs on normal Android phones). MicroG doesn't have the bloat and tracking and other closed source functionality, but rather acts as a stand-in that other apps can talk to (when they'd normally be talking to Google Play services). This has to be installed and configured and I would refer to the microG github or other documentation. GrapheneOS has its own sandboxed Google Play Services which is basically unmodified Google Play Services, crammed into its own sandbox with no special permissions, and a compatibility layer that retains some functionality while keeping it from being able to access app data with high level permissions like it would normally do on a vanilla Android phone.
  • 817 Stimmen
    41 Beiträge
    21 Aufrufe
    C
    And then price us out
  • 31 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    7 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • San Francisco crypto founder faked his own death

    Technology technology
    10
    1
    98 Stimmen
    10 Beiträge
    12 Aufrufe
    S
    My head canon is that Satoshi Nakamoto... ... is Hideo Kojima. Anyway, Satoshi is the pseudonym used on the original... white paper, design doc, whatever it was, for Bitcoin. There's no doubt about that, I was there back before even Mt. Gox became a bitcoin exchange, on the forums discussing it. I thought it was a neat idea, at the time... and then I realized 95% of the discussions on that forum were about 'the ethics of fully informed ponzi schemes' and such, very little devoted to actual technical development... realized this was probably a bad omen.
  • Are We All Becoming More Hostile Online?

    Technology technology
    31
    1
    212 Stimmen
    31 Beiträge
    29 Aufrufe
    A
    Back in the day I just assumed everyone was lying. Or trying to get people worked up, and we called them trolls. Learning how to ignore the trolls, and not having trust for strangers on the internet, coupled with the ability to basically not care what random people said is a lost art. Somehow people forgot to give other the people this memo, including the "you don't fucking join social networks as your self". Anonymity makes this all work. Eternal September newbies just didn't get it.
  • 0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    7 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet