Skip to content

Starlink tries to block Virginia’s plan to bring fiber Internet to residents

Technology
147 88 1
  • 250 Stimmen
    43 Beiträge
    77 Aufrufe
    P
    I'll use the money I save from dumping HBO to buy extra treats for me parrot. Yarrr!
  • 75 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    35 Aufrufe
    nkat2112@sh.itjust.worksN
    This is beautiful - and a noble service for humanity. Thank you for posting this, OP!
  • matrix is cooked

    Technology technology
    75
    1
    180 Stimmen
    75 Beiträge
    2k Aufrufe
    penguin202124@sh.itjust.worksP
    That's very fair. Better start contributing I guess.
  • You are Already On "The List"

    Technology technology
    2
    47 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    34 Aufrufe
    M
    Even if they're wrong. It's too late. You're already on the list. .... The only option is to destroy the list and those who will use it
  • Tribo777: Promoções e Recompensas Que Valem a Pena

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    1 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    20 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 137 Stimmen
    2 Beiträge
    39 Aufrufe
    treadful@lemmy.zipT
    https://archive.is/oTR8Q
  • 13 Stimmen
    22 Beiträge
    241 Aufrufe
    T
    You might enjoy this blog post someone linked in another thread earlier today https://www.wheresyoured.at/the-era-of-the-business-idiot/
  • 92 Stimmen
    42 Beiträge
    379 Aufrufe
    G
    You don’t understand. The tracking and spying is the entire point of the maneuver. The ‘children are accessing porn’ thing is just a Trojan horse to justify the spying. I understand what are you saying, I simply don't consider to check if a law is applied as a Trojan horse in itself. I would agree if the EU had said to these sites "give us all the the access log, a list of your subscriber, every data you gather and a list of every IP it ever connected to your site", and even this way does not imply that with only the IP you could know who the user is without even asking the telecom company for help. So, is it a Trojan horse ? Maybe, it heavily depend on how the EU want to do it. If they just ask "show me how you try to avoid that a minor access your material", which normally is the fist step, I don't see how it could be a Trojan horse. It could become, I agree on that. As you pointed out, it’s already illegal for them to access it, and parents are legally required to prevent their children from accessing it. No, parents are not legally required to prevent it. The seller (or provider) is legally required. It is a subtle but important difference. But you don’t lock down the entire population, or institute pre-crime surveillance policies, just because some parents are not going to follow the law. True. You simply impose laws that make mandatories for the provider to check if he can sell/serve something to someone. I mean asking that the cashier of mall check if I am an adult when I buy a bottle of wine is no different than asking to Pornhub to check if the viewer is an adult. I agree that in one case is really simple and in the other is really hard (and it is becoming harder by the day). You then charge the guilty parents after the offense. Ok, it would work, but then how do you caught the offendind parents if not checking what everyone do ? Is it not simpler to try to prevent it instead ?