Skip to content

Grok AI to be available in Tesla vehicles next week, Elon Musk says

Technology
63 52 0
  • 'I've been turned into an AI train announcer - and no one told me'

    Technology technology
    15
    318 Stimmen
    15 Beiträge
    66 Aufrufe
    S
    Yes, the use of the voice was intentionally misleading. That's why it was decided the way it was.
  • How LLMs could be insider threats

    Technology technology
    12
    1
    105 Stimmen
    12 Beiträge
    58 Aufrufe
    patatahooligan@lemmy.worldP
    Of course they're not "three laws safe". They're black boxes that spit out text. We don't have enough understanding and control over how they work to force them to comply with the three laws of robotics, and the LLMs themselves do not have the reasoning capability or the consistency to enforce them even if we prompt them to.
  • 169 Stimmen
    13 Beiträge
    52 Aufrufe
    E
    Hold on let me find something[image: 1b188197-bd96-49bd-8fc0-0598e75468ea.avif]
  • Meta Filed a Lawsuit Against The Entity Behind CrushAI Nudify App.

    Technology technology
    21
    1
    92 Stimmen
    21 Beiträge
    93 Aufrufe
    L
    I know everybody hates AI but to me it's weird to treat artificially generated nudity differently from if somebody painted a naked body with a real person's face on it - which I assume would be legally protected freedom of expression.
  • 429 Stimmen
    102 Beiträge
    177 Aufrufe
    D
    That is bullshit, the economy is created to force you into the labor market. This is just a symptom of capitalism.
  • iFixit says the Switch 2 is even harder to repair than the original

    Technology technology
    126
    1
    698 Stimmen
    126 Beiträge
    374 Aufrufe
    Y
    My understanding is that if they've lasted at least a month and haven't died on you, you probably got a "good" batch and what you have now will be what it stays as for the most part, but a fair number of gulikits just sort of crap out at the 1-2 mo mark. So heads up on that.
  • 462 Stimmen
    94 Beiträge
    309 Aufrufe
    L
    Make them publishers or whatever is required to have it be a legal requirement, have them ban people who share false information. The law doesn't magically make open discussions not open. By design, social media is open. If discussion from the public is closed, then it's no longer social media. ban people who share false information Banning people doesn't stop falsehoods. It's a broken solution promoting a false assurance. Authorities are still fallible & risk banning over unpopular/debatable expressions that may turn out true. There was unpopular dissent over covid lockdown policies in the US despite some dramatic differences with EU policies. Pro-palestinian protests get cracked down. Authorities are vulnerable to biases & swayed. Moreover, when people can just share their falsehoods offline, attempting to ban them online is hard to justify. If print media, through its decline, is being held legally responsible Print media is a controlled medium that controls it writers & approves everything before printing. It has a prepared, coordinated message. They can & do print books full of falsehoods if they want. Social media is open communication where anyone in the entire public can freely post anything before it is revoked. They aren't claiming to spread the truth, merely to enable communication.
  • 27 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    22 Aufrufe
    C
    I really wish their whole lap-dock concept had succeeded. Or at least ran a few more generations, so I could get an upgraded model with USBc