Skip to content

A.I. Is Starting to Wear Down Democracy | Content generated by artificial intelligence has become a factor in elections around the world. Most of it is bad, misleading voters & discrediting elections

Technology
40 24 381
  • datacenter liquid cooling solution

    Technology technology
    35
    34 Stimmen
    35 Beiträge
    177 Aufrufe
    S
    A legit exception might occur with a strict energy-optimization objective, where the point would be transporting heat outside of an HVAC envelope as efficiently as possible. The cost of the additional thermal load is often ignored by hobbyists in their energy calculations but it can be significant. In the context of fixed-capacity solar, for example, it might be cheaper to pipe waste heat from a telco closet to a space that isn’t climate controlled, like a garage, than it would be to expand the solar installation for increased HVAC draw.
  • 27 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    16 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    18 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Army gives shady offer to tech bros so they can play soldier

    Technology technology
    11
    1
    95 Stimmen
    11 Beiträge
    107 Aufrufe
    P
    It is common in the military to give commissioned rank to certain positions for the higher pay grade. The fast tracking takes away from the belief everyone serving with you went through (roughly) the same basic training as you.
  • Mudita Kompakt

    Technology technology
    17
    1
    62 Stimmen
    17 Beiträge
    161 Aufrufe
    anunusualrelic@lemmy.worldA
    There you go then. It's 80 €.
  • 461 Stimmen
    94 Beiträge
    1k Aufrufe
    L
    Make them publishers or whatever is required to have it be a legal requirement, have them ban people who share false information. The law doesn't magically make open discussions not open. By design, social media is open. If discussion from the public is closed, then it's no longer social media. ban people who share false information Banning people doesn't stop falsehoods. It's a broken solution promoting a false assurance. Authorities are still fallible & risk banning over unpopular/debatable expressions that may turn out true. There was unpopular dissent over covid lockdown policies in the US despite some dramatic differences with EU policies. Pro-palestinian protests get cracked down. Authorities are vulnerable to biases & swayed. Moreover, when people can just share their falsehoods offline, attempting to ban them online is hard to justify. If print media, through its decline, is being held legally responsible Print media is a controlled medium that controls it writers & approves everything before printing. It has a prepared, coordinated message. They can & do print books full of falsehoods if they want. Social media is open communication where anyone in the entire public can freely post anything before it is revoked. They aren't claiming to spread the truth, merely to enable communication.
  • 275 Stimmen
    134 Beiträge
    3k Aufrufe
    S
    Wait until AI reduces it to just owners.
  • *deleted by creator*

    Technology technology
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    19 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet