Skip to content

Resurrecting a dead torrent tracker and finding 3 million peers

Technology
59 33 186
  • Breaking news! Criminals (but not only) use crypto, and people get scammed. This happens as well with fiat, so that must surely mean fiat is a scam!

    Flawless logic, really. You people impress me with your thinking.

    if you sell something for $1 at 10am your $1 still buys $1 at 10pm.

    in crypto, it's easily manipulated, and that's by design. it's a scam because the only people who have that control are the wealthy.

    If I sell 1BT worth of something at 10am, it could be worth 2BT at 10pm, but it could also be worth .1BT equally.

    the purpose of a Fiat currency is economic supremacy that is backed by the governing body and the economy that uses it.

    tell me, what governing body or economy is crypto backed by?

  • And if there is. Please seed that.

    I usually do, but in general they're dead for lack of demand

  • paying in crypto is nice partly for this reason

    But a lot of uneducated people will spam "crypto is a scam"

    Crypto is not a scam, it's just plain stupid.

    The entire idea behind it is what a third grader might come up with and think it's a great idea. It's not.

    It literally requires every connected wallet to process the same transactions as everyone else. Can you imagine doing billions of transactions per day this way? It is extremely inefficient and yes, this is one of the reasons why even the relatively low amount of transactions that Bitcoin processes costs more electricity than a small modern country.

    It's in a way comparable to a cpu doing 6+7 in a single CPU cycle whilst AI needs to burn down a forest to answer the same question

    Crypto is stupid.

    I get what its trying to replace and i agree that the current system sucks as well for a long list of reasons, but crypto is NOT the solution. A fundamentally different system must be designed to be able to solve the issues that crypto is trying to solve

  • if you sell something for $1 at 10am your $1 still buys $1 at 10pm.

    in crypto, it's easily manipulated, and that's by design. it's a scam because the only people who have that control are the wealthy.

    If I sell 1BT worth of something at 10am, it could be worth 2BT at 10pm, but it could also be worth .1BT equally.

    the purpose of a Fiat currency is economic supremacy that is backed by the governing body and the economy that uses it.

    tell me, what governing body or economy is crypto backed by?

    None of that is "by design" its just the result of an unstable system. Crypto sucks for a long list of different reasons.

  • None of that is "by design" its just the result of an unstable system. Crypto sucks for a long list of different reasons.

    it is by design for a lot of them.

  • it is by design for a lot of them.

    The instability?

    You're giving it too much credit, especially the altcoins that didn't look beyond "existing". I know, I made one like 7 years ago or so and I ain't proud of it.

    The instability of the worth of these crypto coins is just inherent to the instability of it, and actually not that different from currency fluctuations. You don't think the entire world works with US dollars, no?

  • Crypto is not a scam, it's just plain stupid.

    The entire idea behind it is what a third grader might come up with and think it's a great idea. It's not.

    It literally requires every connected wallet to process the same transactions as everyone else. Can you imagine doing billions of transactions per day this way? It is extremely inefficient and yes, this is one of the reasons why even the relatively low amount of transactions that Bitcoin processes costs more electricity than a small modern country.

    It's in a way comparable to a cpu doing 6+7 in a single CPU cycle whilst AI needs to burn down a forest to answer the same question

    Crypto is stupid.

    I get what its trying to replace and i agree that the current system sucks as well for a long list of reasons, but crypto is NOT the solution. A fundamentally different system must be designed to be able to solve the issues that crypto is trying to solve

    It literally requires every connected wallet to process the same transactions as everyone else.

    wat?

    wallets don't process any transactions other than yours. and even then, wallets do the easy work.

  • Your existence is a scam.

  • Breaking news! Criminals (but not only) use crypto, and people get scammed. This happens as well with fiat, so that must surely mean fiat is a scam!

    Flawless logic, really. You people impress me with your thinking.

    Don't even bother. You'll never get through to these drones.

  • People really need to get over this idea that using crypto to buy things makes you anonymous.

    And people should also know that there are privacy coins and mixers

    I might be mistaken, but isn’t using a mixer considered money laundering in the US?

  • Don't even bother. You'll never get through to these drones.

    Wtf are you talking about

  • Crypto is not a scam, it's just plain stupid.

    The entire idea behind it is what a third grader might come up with and think it's a great idea. It's not.

    It literally requires every connected wallet to process the same transactions as everyone else. Can you imagine doing billions of transactions per day this way? It is extremely inefficient and yes, this is one of the reasons why even the relatively low amount of transactions that Bitcoin processes costs more electricity than a small modern country.

    It's in a way comparable to a cpu doing 6+7 in a single CPU cycle whilst AI needs to burn down a forest to answer the same question

    Crypto is stupid.

    I get what its trying to replace and i agree that the current system sucks as well for a long list of reasons, but crypto is NOT the solution. A fundamentally different system must be designed to be able to solve the issues that crypto is trying to solve

    You don’t understand how crypto works it seems

    It literally requires every connected wallet to process the same transactions as everyone else

    That’s misleading. Your wallet scans blocks for transactions that goes to your wallet, but this is super fast for many cryptocurrencies. Wallets usually sync in seconds.

    this is one of the reasons why even the relatively low amount of transactions that Bitcoin processes costs more electricity than a small modern country.

    No. The main reason is block size and block emission period. Also, you’re completely forgetting the fact that non Proof Of Work cryptocurrencies exist, and have close to 0 electricity cost

    The entire idea behind it is what a third grader might come up with and think it's a great idea. It's not.

    If they do they’re pretty much a fucking genius for their age

  • I might be mistaken, but isn’t using a mixer considered money laundering in the US?

    USA also claimed they owned all BTC that went through dark net markets. I don’t care what they think about X or Y thing

    But yea that would be considered ML in many countries because you’re hiding the links and making it seem like normal money, which it should be imo

  • This post did not contain any content.

    I'm a developer but have utterly no experience with torrent architecture, or for that matter anything outside of standard web services and the kinds of things companies do. But I've been wondering if BitTorrent technology would be usable for federating content for things such as Lemmy. After reading that somebody was begging for money to offset the $5k/month they were spending to run an instance (I mean, that shows true dedicaton but holy crap dude), it seems like a distributed architecture would make a lot more sense than somebody having to foot the bill for a big-ass server. I just personally wouldn't know where to begin on a project like that, but maybe if somebody with the right combo of skills and experience gave it some thought...

  • Wtf are you talking about

    You won't convince anyone one here that crypto isn't a scam. These people are set in their ways.

  • if you sell something for $1 at 10am your $1 still buys $1 at 10pm.

    in crypto, it's easily manipulated, and that's by design. it's a scam because the only people who have that control are the wealthy.

    If I sell 1BT worth of something at 10am, it could be worth 2BT at 10pm, but it could also be worth .1BT equally.

    the purpose of a Fiat currency is economic supremacy that is backed by the governing body and the economy that uses it.

    tell me, what governing body or economy is crypto backed by?

    if you sell something for $1 at 10am your $1 still buys $1 at 10pm.

    This is untrue for pretty much everything, even fiat. Everything is a market. A good example of this: stocks.

    in crypto, it's easily manipulated, and that's by design.

    Now this is just false. You’re just inventing fake facts here. You clearly know nothing of the history of crypto.

    If I sell 1BT worth of something at 10am, it could be worth 2BT at 10pm, but it could also be worth .1BT equally.

    Uhh no? 1 BTC will always be 1 BTC. Its value compared to other assets will change though. And in that case it would have less value indeed. You’re just allergic to high variations and high risks assets. Stocks is exactly the same. Some assets vary more than others. Let me assure you the value of BTC will never do a +/-10x in a day

    tell me, what governing body or economy is crypto backed by?

    Emission (POW, POS…) (or total stock), demand and offer and perceived value, just like everything on earth?

  • You won't convince anyone one here that crypto isn't a scam. These people are set in their ways.

    And stubbornly entitled

    Their uncle must’ve been rug pulled when buying a shitcoin or something and now they believe crypto is nothing but a scam

    But yea there’s nothing to do. If you can’t educate them then let them stay in their ignorance if they like it. I just don’t feel that letting them spread their misinformation is a good thing

  • I'm a developer but have utterly no experience with torrent architecture, or for that matter anything outside of standard web services and the kinds of things companies do. But I've been wondering if BitTorrent technology would be usable for federating content for things such as Lemmy. After reading that somebody was begging for money to offset the $5k/month they were spending to run an instance (I mean, that shows true dedicaton but holy crap dude), it seems like a distributed architecture would make a lot more sense than somebody having to foot the bill for a big-ass server. I just personally wouldn't know where to begin on a project like that, but maybe if somebody with the right combo of skills and experience gave it some thought...

    2 years ago I talked about the core problem with federated services was the abismal scale ability.

    I essentially got ridiculed.

    And here we are, with incredibly predictable scaling problems.

    If we refuse to acknowledge problems till they become critical, we will never grow past a blip on the corner of the internet. Protocol development is HARD and expensive.

  • if you sell something for $1 at 10am your $1 still buys $1 at 10pm.

    in crypto, it's easily manipulated, and that's by design. it's a scam because the only people who have that control are the wealthy.

    If I sell 1BT worth of something at 10am, it could be worth 2BT at 10pm, but it could also be worth .1BT equally.

    the purpose of a Fiat currency is economic supremacy that is backed by the governing body and the economy that uses it.

    tell me, what governing body or economy is crypto backed by?

    Your $1 has absolutely changed in value by 10pm. What do you think inflation is? It might not be enough change for the store to bother changing prices but the value changes constantly.

    Watch the foreign exchange markets, your $1 is changing in value compared to every other currency constantly.

    The only difference between fiat and crypto is that changing the prices in the store is difficult, and the volume of trade is high enough to reduce volatility in the value of your $. There are plenty of cases of hyperinflation in history where stores have to change prices on a daily basis, meaning that fiat is not immune to volatility.

    To prevent that volatility we just have things like the federal reserve, debt limits, federal regulations, etc that are designed to keep you the investor (money holders) happy with keeping that money in dollars instead of assets. The value is somewhat stable as long as the government is solvent.

    Crypto doesn't have those external controls, instead it has internal controls, i.e. mining difficulty. Which from a user perspective is better because it can't be printed at will by the government.

    Long story short fiat is no different than crypto, there is no real tangible value, so value is what people think it is. Unfortunately crypto's value is driven more by speculative "investors" than by actual trade demand which means it is more volatile. If enough of the world changed to crypto it would just as stable as your $.

    Not saying crypto is a good thing just saying that it isn't any better or worse. It needs daily usage for real trade by a large portion of the population to reduce the volatility, instead of just being used to gamble against the dollar.

    Our governments would likely never let that happen though, they can't give up their ability to print money. It's far easier to keep getting elected when you print the cash to operate the government, than it is to raise taxes to pay for the things they need.

    The absolutely worthless meme coin scams/forks/etc are just scammers and gamblers trying to rip each other off. They just make any sort of useful critical mass of trade less and less plausible because it gives all crypto a bad name. Not that Bitcoin/Ethereum started out any different but now that enough people are using them splitting your user base is just self defeating

  • 2 years ago I talked about the core problem with federated services was the abismal scale ability.

    I essentially got ridiculed.

    And here we are, with incredibly predictable scaling problems.

    If we refuse to acknowledge problems till they become critical, we will never grow past a blip on the corner of the internet. Protocol development is HARD and expensive.

    Yeah, volunteer moderation is also an issue, any decent ppl doing it get burnt out if they get an influx of ppl and quit also like lemm.ee

  • YouTube is getting more AI.

    Technology technology
    11
    1
    38 Stimmen
    11 Beiträge
    49 Aufrufe
    E
    Yaaaaay! Said no one.
  • 128 Stimmen
    5 Beiträge
    24 Aufrufe
    V
    a subtle edit resolving a duplicate reference in a way that removes displays from the list of parts that must be replaceable by a layperson with basic tools That's fucking significant change, considering probably even more smartphones become ewaste from cracked screens than anything else by a long shot...
  • 15 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    11 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 77 Stimmen
    21 Beiträge
    63 Aufrufe
    G
    Because the trillions is the point.. Not security.
  • 0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    9 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 311 Stimmen
    37 Beiträge
    65 Aufrufe
    S
    Same, especially when searching technical or niche topics. Since there aren't a ton of results specific to the topic, mostly semi-related results will appear in the first page or two of a regular (non-Gemini) Google search, just due to the higher popularity of those webpages compared to the relevant webpages. Even the relevant webpages will have lots of non-relevant or semi-relevant information surrounding the answer I'm looking for. I don't know enough about it to be sure, but Gemini is probably just scraping a handful of websites on the first page, and since most of those are only semi-related, the resulting summary is a classic example of garbage in, garbage out. I also think there's probably something in the code that looks for information that is shared across multiple sources and prioritizing that over something that's only on one particular page (possibly the sole result with the information you need). Then, it phrases the summary as a direct answer to your query, misrepresenting the actual information on the pages they scraped. At least Gemini gives sources, I guess. The thing that gets on my nerves the most is how often I see people quote the summary as proof of something without checking the sources. It was bad before the rollout of Gemini, but at least back then Google was mostly scraping text and presenting it with little modification, along with a direct link to the webpage. Now, it's an LLM generating text phrased as a direct answer to a question (that was also AI-generated from your search query) using AI-summarized data points scraped from multiple webpages. It's obfuscating the source material further, but I also can't help but feel like it exposes a little of the behind-the-scenes fuckery Google has been doing for years before Gemini. How it bastardizes your query by interpreting it into a question, and then prioritizes homogeneous results that agree on the "answer" to your "question". For years they've been doing this to a certain extent, they just didn't share how they interpreted your query.
  • 23 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    4 Aufrufe
    D
    Whew..... None of the important file hosters ..
  • 32 Stimmen
    8 Beiträge
    36 Aufrufe
    J
    Apparently, it was required to be allowed in that state: Reading a bit more, during the sentencing phase in that state people making victim impact statements can choose their format for expression, and it's entirely allowed to make statements about what other people would say. So the judge didn't actually have grounds to deny it. No jury during that phase, so it's just the judge listening to free form requests in both directions. It's gross, but the rules very much allow the sister to make a statement about what she believes her brother would have wanted to say, in whatever format she wanted. From: https://sh.itjust.works/comment/18471175 influence the sentence From what I've seen, to be fair, judges' decisions have varied wildly regardless, sadly, and sentences should be more standardized. I wonder what it would've been otherwise.