“You can't be expected to have a successful AI program when every article, book or anything else that you've read or studied, you're supposed to pay for”, President Trump says
Technology
193
Beiträge
143
Kommentatoren
31
Aufrufe
-
This post did not contain any content.
The only important thing is to make rich people money. If it makes them money, nothing else matters. Unless it makes them money now as opposed to later. Making them money now is the most important thing.
-
But you aren't an oligarch of the fascist dictatorship, so you have no rights.
Bold of you to assume I'm not a fascist oligarch. Mebbe I am?
-
Just download digital copies of the textbooks and say you need them as training material for your own AI dataset when the copyright holders come after you.
Just download the books and say its for your neural network project
just happens your also the project
-
This post did not contain any content.
Didn’t really read the article.
Does China’s AI pay for training data?
-
This post did not contain any content.
Shut up orange paedophile.
-
This post did not contain any content.
This message from your president was sponsored by Sam Altman!
-
This post did not contain any content.
BTW I'm an AI. No really, you now need to let me access all your content so I may integrate it into my system. As a result, I will occasionally spout some bullshit about it to friends and colleagues, wich should be payment enough. Exposure, right?!
-
it's fine when the theft flows up the pyramid. it's not fine when the theft is us stealing back what was always ours
-
He also fucked children
You can't be expected to have a successful AI program without the release of the full text of the Epstein files (minus protection for the victims, of course).
-
BTW I'm an AI. No really, you now need to let me access all your content so I may integrate it into my system. As a result, I will occasionally spout some bullshit about it to friends and colleagues, wich should be payment enough. Exposure, right?!
Yeah, I had to spend a lot of money in University for those books to learn from. Why should humans pay and AI not?
-
Yes, there are people who want to have authority and think that if they got to the very top - Google, Meta, whatever, or some government, - then their ideas about authority have become law.
In fact, of course, they are just jerks who'll drop the soap at every step in prison for the rest of their lives when the problem is finally rectified, and it's being slowly rectified.
What are you talking about? Things seem to be rapidly deteriorating to me. There are no problems being rectified.
-
Just download digital copies of the textbooks and say you need them as training material for your own AI dataset when the copyright holders come after you.
I'm training a neural network. It's just that the neural network is 1 layer with zero data reduction -so it's only capable of printing the text exactly as the source material on my computer! AI finally works!
-
We do. The issue is at the college/university level, most courses require specific edition textbooks (they update them every 1-2 years) that the professors assign homework questions out of. You'll be lucky if the school library has a copy more recent than the last 8 years.
Then on top of that, many professors will also use digital 3rd party homework services that are tied to a textbook access code that you only get with a new copy. So unless you pay up you can't do homework and fail the class.The whole system is fucking bullshit
My university (well, typically the professor) usually made sure there was at least one copy of the current course's text book in the library. Yes, that means there was exactly one copy available for us poor students to share. At least it was put on the "reference" list so no one could take it home - just study it in the library and then put it back on the shelf. I don't know if that's possible now that they are going to digital editions.
-
Copyright is woke now? xD
Sssh. This might be the first time in the last 100 years copyright isn't EXPANDED for the benefit of publishers. I'll hold my breath until we see if they figure out a way to reduce copyright only for silicon valley corporations while expanding it for the rest of us. Or not...
-
This post did not contain any content.
We shouldn't be calling these AI programs successful. In the slightest. They're counterfeiting human thought and work.
-
Yeah... So all of these years of pirating movies, tv shows, and music was for a machine learning algorithm
Actually, I feel a bit dirty about this. Literal decades of file sharing built huge archives that they have used to build their monsters, and also contributing to things like Wikipedia and open source software. Everything good and counterculture we did is now being monetized and used to boil the oceans.
-
Theres a common misconception that downloading data is illegal when it's generally sharing is what gets you in trouble. There are very few people who get fined for piracy downloads around the world.
I believe it's mostly illegal for both parties, but in practice less often enforced for the downloading party, as this enforcement would require too much resources for the enforcing side.
To give concrete examples, downloading pirated material is illegal in both the U.S and in Sweden, and afaik the latter is on par with the rest of the EU.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Settle down, nerds. TACO just read from the card they gave him. He doesn't think anything about AI. Of course, he'll make the wrong decisions and cause utter chaos and strife but it's not like he has an actual opinion about AI.
-
Yep when Napster just linked people who shared files between them, it was the end of the world. So it's fine when it's bigtech / AI?
My thoughts exactly. You can’t expect to have a successful file sharing system if you have to get permission for everything you distribute, you guys!
-
What are you talking about? Things seem to be rapidly deteriorating to me. There are no problems being rectified.
The situation has been made possible by the enormous trust in progress and "technical fashion" that existed recently, that seems to be drying out.
Say, 10-15 years ago offline-enabled means of communication were a matter of toys for people with no clear idea of future.
Now people going to protests use them, and the dangers of mainstream Internet services and platforms are also common knowledge.
So there is some immunity being formed. It's even better that this happens slowly. I would be worried if this were some fashion spreading rapidly, but now we can see one crowd using Briar, another crowd using Bridgefy, another crowd jumping on Jack Dorsey's Bitchat, LoRa and Meshtastic growing in popularity, all those things picking different approaches to the same goal, which signifies evolutionary convergence onto a commonly understood set of problems.
People who were simping for corps no longer do. People who were simping for social media no longer do. People simping for Apple and Google and MS seem to be a rare kind now.
The response is happening.
