Skip to content

Fairphone announces the €599 Fairphone 6, with a 6.31" 120Hz LTPO OLED display, a Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 chip, and enhanced modularity with 12 swappable parts

Technology
555 240 1.3k
  • Tesla debuts in India with upscale showroom launch in Mumbai

    Technology technology
    4
    1
    20 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    6 Aufrufe
    C
    Far too late. India has Chinese cars which are much cheaper and superior to the Teslas by now. Only people you will see in these are idiots with too much money.
  • Say Hello to the World's Largest Hard Drive, a Massive 36TB Seagate

    Technology technology
    260
    1
    604 Stimmen
    260 Beiträge
    52 Aufrufe
    K
    Sure, if you have many TBs of data changes per day you probably want a different solution. But that would also suggest you don't need to keep it for very long.
  • Bumble's AI icebreakers are mainly breaking EU law

    Technology technology
    18
    1
    184 Stimmen
    18 Beiträge
    83 Aufrufe
    S
    This is just that zizek quote
  • 311 Stimmen
    37 Beiträge
    166 Aufrufe
    S
    Same, especially when searching technical or niche topics. Since there aren't a ton of results specific to the topic, mostly semi-related results will appear in the first page or two of a regular (non-Gemini) Google search, just due to the higher popularity of those webpages compared to the relevant webpages. Even the relevant webpages will have lots of non-relevant or semi-relevant information surrounding the answer I'm looking for. I don't know enough about it to be sure, but Gemini is probably just scraping a handful of websites on the first page, and since most of those are only semi-related, the resulting summary is a classic example of garbage in, garbage out. I also think there's probably something in the code that looks for information that is shared across multiple sources and prioritizing that over something that's only on one particular page (possibly the sole result with the information you need). Then, it phrases the summary as a direct answer to your query, misrepresenting the actual information on the pages they scraped. At least Gemini gives sources, I guess. The thing that gets on my nerves the most is how often I see people quote the summary as proof of something without checking the sources. It was bad before the rollout of Gemini, but at least back then Google was mostly scraping text and presenting it with little modification, along with a direct link to the webpage. Now, it's an LLM generating text phrased as a direct answer to a question (that was also AI-generated from your search query) using AI-summarized data points scraped from multiple webpages. It's obfuscating the source material further, but I also can't help but feel like it exposes a little of the behind-the-scenes fuckery Google has been doing for years before Gemini. How it bastardizes your query by interpreting it into a question, and then prioritizes homogeneous results that agree on the "answer" to your "question". For years they've been doing this to a certain extent, they just didn't share how they interpreted your query.
  • Programming languages

    Technology technology
    1
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    11 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • 182 Stimmen
    39 Beiträge
    174 Aufrufe
    H
    https://archive.org/details/swgrap
  • 22 Stimmen
    14 Beiträge
    71 Aufrufe
    F
    you don’t need to worry about trying to enforce it ( By the simple expedient of there being essentially nothing you can enforce.
  • *deleted by creator*

    Technology technology
    4
    1
    0 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    38 Aufrufe
    O
    I feel like I'm in those years of You really want a 3d TV, right? Right? 3D is what you've been waiting for, right? all over again, but with a different technology. It will be VR's turn again next. I admit I'm really rooting for affordable, real-world, daily-use AR though.