Skip to content

Reddit in talks to embrace Sam Altman’s iris-scanning Orb to verify users

Technology
154 121 4.0k
  • best porn sites

    Technology technology
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    17 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • OSTP Has a Choice to Make: Science or Politics?

    Technology technology
    7
    1
    30 Stimmen
    7 Beiträge
    73 Aufrufe
    B
    Ye I expect so, I don't like the way this author just doesn't bother explaining her points. She just states that she disagrees and says they should be left to their own rules. Which is probably fine, but that's just lazy or she's not mentioning the difference for another reason
  • 0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    18 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Strategies to Enhance the Efficiency of Livestock Conveyor Systems

    Technology technology
    1
    0 Stimmen
    1 Beiträge
    20 Aufrufe
    Niemand hat geantwortet
  • Texting myself the weather every day

    Technology technology
    4
    15 Stimmen
    4 Beiträge
    48 Aufrufe
    G
    Even being too lazy to open the weather app, there are so many better and free ways of receiving a message on your phone. This is profoundly stupid.
  • 370 Stimmen
    26 Beiträge
    304 Aufrufe
    hollownaught@lemmy.worldH
    Bit misleading. Tumour-associated antigens can very easily be detected very early. Problem is, these are only associated with cancer, and provide a very high rate of false positives They're better used as a stepping stone for further testing, or just seeing how advanced a cancer is That is to say, I'm assuming that's what this is about, as i didnt rwad the article. It's the first thing I thought of when I heard "cancer in bloodstream", as the other options tend to be a bit more bleak Edit: they're talking about cancer "shedding genetic material", which I hate how general they're being. Probably talking about proto oncogenes from dead tumour debris, but seems different to what I was expecting
  • How Do I Prepare My Phone for a Protest?

    Technology technology
    139
    1
    505 Stimmen
    139 Beiträge
    3k Aufrufe
    D
    So first, even here we see foundation money and big tech, not government. Facebook, Google, etc mostly love net neutrality, tolerate encryption, anf see utility in anonymous internet access, mostly because these things don't interfere with their core advertising businesses, and generally have helped them. I didn't see Comcast and others in the ISP oligopoly on that list, probably because they would not benefit from net neutrality, encryption, and privacy for obvious reasons. The EFF advocates for particular civil libertarian policies, always has. That does attract certain donors, but not others. They have plenty of diverse and grassroots support too. One day they may have to choose between their corpo donors and their values, but I have yet to see them abandon principles.
  • 191 Stimmen
    26 Beiträge
    237 Aufrufe
    A
    I wish everyone could read your comment right now. Spot on